gtb1943
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,282
- Reaction score
- 6,503
Being positive when there is little evidence for such is simply unrealistic and certainly will lead to excessive disappointment.Better than being negative all the time.
Being positive when there is little evidence for such is simply unrealistic and certainly will lead to excessive disappointment.Better than being negative all the time.
after one year that is harsh. Remember BP and Landry both said you should try and give high draft picks three years to prove themselves.Bust.
Until proven otherwise.
I think it was mostly a matter of the fact the guy couldn’t play football very well. Reminds me of Shawn Oakman…..lot of hype because he looks like a freak but stunk up the field.Mazi's 1st year is mind boggling. I can only guess what the heck happened. I just hope things get corrected and he begins to really take some steps forward as the big athletic DT they drafted.
Jalen Carter non existent? LOL,People keep talking about Mazi like he is a bust. DTs often don't show up year 1. Not everyone is Aaron Donald. Very few are. Vita Vea didn't do anything in year 1. Williams of the Jets didn't do crap until midway through season 2. Jalen Carter and Jordan Davis of the Eagles have been non existent. It takes DTs several years. A lot of these guys are high first round picks, what do you expect from a late round first pick?
He flashed. Put it this way, going by the Eagles media and fans, they are expecting a lot more from him.Jalen Carter non existent? LOL,
Being negative so one is not disappointed is not good for one's mental health. IMO.Being positive when there is little evidence for such is simply unrealistic and certainly will lead to excessive disappointment.
So the company doesn’t believe Mazi needs to step up and be who they thought he was when he was drafted?Nice article from Mickey about Mazi needing to be the player that Dallas expected when they drafted him.
How the new DL coach and Zimmer and his scheme will benefit Mazi. However Mazi needs to step up as well.
Mickey did not tow the company line on this one.
so now you are a doctor?Being negative so one is not disappointed is not good for one's mental health. IMO.
I rather think positive or in reality, have cautious optimism, then deal with the consequences. Sure it is disappointing getting knocked out of the playoffs as we have.
But it is not the end of the world. Move on, as I enjoy the seasons as they unfold. No, I am not content with 12-5 then 1 and done. It is a part of life and sports.
So he doubled his college sack total in one horrible rookie season in the NFL. Remember the 3 year rule dude. Mazi played injured in the CFB playoffs and still made plays for a NT/DT.Mazi put the same things on film in Dallas that he put on film at Michigan. He had 2 TFLs and 0.5 sacks in 14 games as a junior, and got manhandled by NFL starting guard Steve Avila in the CFB playoffs.
This is just who he is. We drafted him based on who he could be, but that obviously comes with a lot of risk. I had him with a 3rd round grade.
This seems to happen when you draft strictly off measurables and don't factor in their lack of production.I think it was mostly a matter of the fact the guy couldn’t play football very well. Reminds me of Shawn Oakman…..lot of hype because he looks like a freak but stunk up the field.
More like Hill 2.0+1...... coz right now, we are trending to Taco 2.0 but with a better attitude if that helps (lol)
They could’ve watched tape…. One look at the TCU tape and I would’ve taken him off my board altogetherThis seems to happen when you draft strictly off measurables and don't factor in their lack of production.
I wouldn't take him off but guys with low production should be taken after the 3rd round.They could’ve watched tape…. One look at the TCU tape and I would’ve taken him off my board altogether
It's having Mazi shed so much weight that concerns me.1. The team’s bizarre use of him as a 1T. Why have him shed weight when you drafted him to supposedly plug up holes and absorb blockers and contribute in the running game?