Matt Stafford was never Dak. I don't know why people say this. It's as silly as saying Dan Marino used to be Dak...because HE never won a SB too.
2 years. That's all. Your correct. On all counts. This notion that we are pigeon hold into a corner because of Daks deal is what's really ridiculous. If Jerry and Stephen REALLY had the stomach for getting out of it, or just cutting bait , they could in 2 years. Or if Dak organically just retires or can't play anymore due to injury. It happens all the time. I'm not concerned as much about the Dak contract as I am about Jerry and Stephen further killing this franchise. We can maneuver anytime we want and sign who we want. That's a fact. With or without Dak. Even Todd Archer on Bryan Broaddus' podcast with Jeff Cavanaugh, said this. Do the Jones Boys have the wherewithal? I highly doubt it . They appear to be positioning themselves for selling the team or putting shares of the team on the stock market. I say this because even for them, there behavior this year has been bizarre. Many fans think they might sell the team outright. Jerry seems disengaged, disinterested in sinking money into improving the product on the field. We shall see.
Marino got to a super bowl early in his career. Stafford, with all his talent, never won a playoff game until he went to LA. Thats the analogy. Its not any more absurd than your ridiculous assertion that we would have to throw in first round picks to trade Dak.
Well, It depends on the situation. You don't want to throw a young QB in where you don't have a rb or a stable OL...... like Carolina did with Bryce Young and Chicago is doing with Caleb Williams.
Hes too greedy
A competent gm nowhere to be found unfortunately
im sorry but Dak = Stafford is absurd
Use your EYES when trying to compare QBs abilities. And if it STILL doesn't make sense, here's the true barometer: just watch. Nobody will trade for Dak. Somebody DID trade for Stafford. Why? Because people with football minds looked at Stafford at thought "hmmmmm, I bet we can win a SB with his talent" .. and they were RIGHT. Those same football minds will look at Dak and internally say "no thanks", and the proof will be obvious to you when nobody trades for him.
Use ur eyes. Not stats...
yet this average arm QB, barely good for CFL was top 5 passing in the league in the past few years.
its hilarious to see the dak haters clamour over each other with more outrageous comments to see who can out do the other.
its like watching rats fight over remaining food and they start to attack each other.
If we were sitting here with an unsigned Dak...the optimism here looking forward to the draft would be amazing. Lining up the next QB/RB tandem would be very exciting.
You’re making this up. NFL teams may not offer shares to be sold publicly. There are a select group of private equity firms, already vetted by the league, that are allowed to buy as much as 10% (no more) of an individual franchise. Jerry Jones is not allowed to sell “shares of the team on the stock market”. There is no indication Jerry Jones has any intention of selling the Dallas Cowboys. None. Saying otherwise is typical Cowboys fan nonsense.
To trade Dak the Cowboys would have to find that team that wants him and can afford him in their current salary structure. And Dak would have to agree to it. The team he agrees to be traded to would know Jerry is limited to where he can trade him to, and would take full advantage. The Cowboys would likely have to trade him for a third round pick, but send the team taking him their 4th and a 5th. Otherwise they can simply keep him and build a competitive team around him.
