Mike Vick....

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
Let me say I WOULD NOT.But,I am asking u guys would you take him as a backup?I am curious of your opinions.

Plus;defenses couldnt gameplan and he could be used in slash formations
Negative:Everything that comes with him,including all the negative publicity,and having another thug on the team
 
God, I was afraid this is what this would be if I clicked on it. I should have known better.

:bang2:

To answer the question...

Not only no but heck no!
 
Not with a gun to my head.

We had a team with too many distractions already. Adding that one would be nuts.
 
I would not under any circumstances. ANY.
I would rather lose than have to watch that dog abuser playing on the cowboys. It would be an insult to the star and the history of our team.
 
How about we stay away from the idiots who can't stay out of trouble for one offseason? Especially since this one isn't even a good QB. He's a running back who can occasionally complete a pass.

Just a thought.
 
Why not? Then we can have people join up just to defend him.:)
Some more fun.
 
Ok I agree he is way too much negativity too handle.Would you guys be interested ina Vick type of QB to mix things up?There is a few semi decent young guys who have that mobility like Vick.
 
juckie;2547670 said:
Let me say I WOULD NOT.But,I am asking u guys would you take him as a backup?I am curious of your opinions.

Plus;defenses couldnt gameplan and he could be used in slash formations
Negative:Everything that comes with him,including all the negative publicity,and having another thug on the team

Do I want a dog-killer wearing the star???

HELL NO!!!!
 
juckie;2547686 said:
Ok I agree he is way too much negativity too handle.Would you guys be interested ina Vick type of QB to mix things up?There is a few semi decent young guys who have that mobility like Vick.

Am i interested in competition for Romo? Yes.
 
This makes a lot of sense if you really think about it.

And I mean really REALLY think about it.
 
Dave_in-NC;2547681 said:
Why not? Then we can have people join up just to defend him.:)
Some more fun.

That would be easy. Vick's not nearly as bad as T.O.

Killing and mutilating animals is nothing compared to blaming the system for your lack of production or venting to your position coach after a tough loss.
 
JordanTaber;2547722 said:
That would be easy. Vick's not nearly as bad as T.O.

Killing and mutilating animals is nothing compared to blaming the system for your lack of production or venting to your position coach after a tough loss.

Amazing, owens no where mentioned in this thread then you show up.:lmao2:

Have you ever posted about any thing else?
 
I think a mobile QB would be nice,someone to mix it up.I used Vick just to see what u guys would say .lol.
 
Dave_in-NC;2547730 said:
Amazing, owens no where mentioned in this thread then you show up.:lmao2:

Have you ever posted about any thing else?

This was a thinly veiled Owens thread.

Come on. We all know where this was headed.

"Why not? Jerry Jones already signz all da distractionz--T.O., Pacman, and Tank."
 
JordanTaber;2547738 said:
This was a thinly veiled Owens thread.

Come on. We all know where this was headed.

"Why not? Jerry Jones already signz all da distractionz--T.O., Pacman, and Tank."

Actually it was a pretty light hearted thread. I'm sure you will change that.
 
JordanTaber;2547738 said:
This was a thinly veiled Owens thread.

Come on. We all know where this was headed.

"Why not? Jerry Jones already signz all da distractionz--T.O., Pacman, and Tank."

It was? :huh:


Well, let's see.

M-I-K-E V-I-C-K!

Wait I see the "E" is common to both Owens and Mike. I'm still looking for the O-W-N-S.

Can you help me find it, please? ;)
 
#1 I have said it every time someone brings him. Goodell will never let him back in the league.

#2 OH HELL NAW

:laugh2:
 
Back
Top