Mina has Dak 8

Dak IS their team, bro.

You don’t like Dak you’re an Eagles fan.
I guess so, I don't know or even get it. I do not like Dak because of the way he plays, period. I'm sure he is a fine person. I do not like Micah because he is a damn brat kid.

So, I guess now I need to go shopping for an eagle jersey, according to what I'm reading.
 
This has long been my argument on Dak. Its not that Dak is uncapable of winning, its not that hes a bad QB....I simply think you either have a top 5 guy at the position or you dont, and investing in a non elite player is a dangerous game given the salaries QB command. A top 10ish QB is great, until the playoffs get here....then you typically have one of the lesser QBs left. Unless I had a Mahomes, Allen, Burrow type I would rather invest heavily in the rest of my team before I pay top money to my QB.
This is exactly what the argument has been about. We all wanted extra resources invested in other positions. Because we all knew Dak was a dime a dozen QB
 
His haters like yourself are blinded by hate. He has a winning QB record so he’s not a loser. He’s led the Cowboys to four NFC East titles, which is the most since Troy Aikman. If you’re saying he’s a loser because of his playoff record then you must think Dan Marino, Dan Fouts and Warren Moon are losers because they all had losing playoff records.
I think we have to take into account that the Chargers, Dolphins, and Oilers are awful franchises who always finds a way to NOT win a Super Bowl.

Kinda like the Cowboys in the last 30 years.
 
His haters like yourself are blinded by hate. He has a winning QB record so he’s not a loser. He’s led the Cowboys to four NFC East titles, which is the most since Troy Aikman. If you’re saying he’s a loser because of his playoff record then you must think Dan Marino, Dan Fouts and Warren Moon are losers because they all had losing playoff records.
When’s the parade for all those guys?
 
This is fair. Agreed. But I used those 2 QBs to prove a point. Dilfer had an all-time defense led by Ray Lewis and Ed Reed, a strong running game, etc., and they won the SB. Marino had the Mark Brothers and nothing else and loss the SB.

Yet it boggles my mind that someone would dare say Marino was a loser. But that's just me.
In addition to that I would Add that he lost to Montana
 
I think we have to take into account that the Chargers, Dolphins, and Oilers are awful franchises who always finds a way to NOT win a Super Bowl.

Kinda like the Cowboys in the last 30 years.
Not sure where you get the Dolphins were an awful franchise with Don Shula as the head coach. They had the only undefeated team in NFL history and went to 5 Super Bowls.
 
Mahomes is the best quarterback in the league. It's a team friendly deal given its length and his actual productivity and use to the team.

Jalen Hurts has proved his worth to the team with excellent performances in two Superbowls. As a mobile QB he also massively helps with the team's running game. Again, he is well worth paying.

He is not a standard overpaid immobile run of the mill quarterback like Dak Prescott who is also on a 4 year contract.
So you are saying success determines which quarterbacks are overpaid? Purdy right now is overpaid, according to you, but Hurts is not because he performed well in two Super Bowls.

BTW, I happen to like Mahomes' contract. I think the structure of it gives the team a lot of leeway that they've used over the years with restructures. I wish Dak would have agreed to such a deal (don't know if one like it was even offered) because it provides a whole lot more play for the team. It doesn't mean that Mahomes is underpaid. The guaranteed money has made sure he's gotten his. It just allows structure to move money around as needed.
 
Not sure where you get the Dolphins were an awful franchise with Don Shula as the head coach. They had the only undefeated team in NFL history and went to 5 Super Bowls.
Their franchise had started to degrade after the 70s. Their franchise is to blame for Marino's lack of a Super Bowl.... because it certainly wasn't Marino.
 
What did they win?
They won a lot of games over their careers and gave their teams a chance. If they were garbage like you think QBs are that don’t win championships they wouldn’t have been first ballot Hall of Famer’s. You keep putting it entirely on the QBs. I guess you think Philly has won two Super Bowls the past eight years entirely because of Foles and Jalen Hurts? Do you think Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson were anything great because they won a Super Bowl?
 
They won a lot of games over their careers and gave their teams a chance. If they were garbage like you think QBs are that don’t win championships they wouldn’t have been first ballot Hall of Famer’s. You keep putting it entirely on the QBs. I guess you think Philly has won two Super Bowls the past eight years entirely because of Foles and Jalen Hurts? Do you think Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson were anything great because they won a Super Bowl?
This is a stupid argument.

You either have won or you haven’t.

If you want to give our participation trophies then fine, but I chose not too.
 
This is a stupid argument.

You either have won or you haven’t.

If you want to give our participation trophies then fine, but I chose not too.
Every argument with you is stupid because you have an agenda. So a gold jacket is just given out to those who participated? lol You need to learn that championships are about having a great team.
 
Gold jacket and championships are different.

You know your argument is dumb that’s why you’re trying to shift it.
Your argument is dumb because you’re trying to spin that if a QB hasn’t won a championship they’re losers. A gold jacket is passed out to great players, not players that were deemed losers. :thumbup: You’re not helping your reaction score any with this argument.
 
Your argument is dumb because you’re trying to spin that if a QB hasn’t won a championship they’re losers. A gold jacket is passed out to great players, not players that were deemed losers. :thumbup: You’re not helping your reaction score any with this argument.
What is the opposite of win?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,901
Messages
13,903,982
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top