MNF SF vs Colts

so your saying milton and lance are better qb's right now and you would roll with them over rivers??
His arm is lacking on longer throws, but those arent really needed.
What? Why do you guys invent arguments in your head that are never even presented or hinted at?

I'm not saying anything bad about Rivers other than his arm looks dead. Even said he still has his accuracy.

How did you get from that to "you think Lance and Milton are better QB's?"
 
What? Why do you guys invent arguments in your head that are never even presented or hinted at?

I'm not saying anything bad about Rivers other than his arm looks dead. Even said he still has his accuracy.

How did you get from that to "you think Lance and Milton are better QB's?"
I agree and they knew his deficiencies when they brought them back that's the very reason that players like him and Big Ben they they retired...

I don't think there was too many available although I didn't think I'd have picked up Ryan Tannehill if I was them I don't know why they don't think he would have been better but I don't think a backup like his suggestion would have been better the problem is you had to play defense we know first hand that if you give up 48 points it's really not going to fall to the offense as the big problem here.

If you bring a guy like Rivers on board you must play great defense and have a great run game in a really good offensive line because he's not moving And in the first game they did pretty well with that in this game they didn't none of it none of it was good especially on defense if you give up 48 points you're probably going to lose the game no matter how good your quarterback plays we've seen it first hand....
 
Good Lord, I thought I was watching a Cowboys game. Hey Indy, give us back our defense, we got a game to play on Christmas.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,040
Messages
14,508,616
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top