cowboys5xsbs
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,245
- Reaction score
- 22,054
I was not expecting that WOW Vikings you suck
WR in the area….well, some where close…Yes, it didn’t make it to LOS
Int grounding?
No, there was a receiver in the area. The LOS thing only matters if he's outside the tackle box: if you're inside it and there's no receiver, it's grounding regardless.Yes, it didn’t make it to LOS
It made it 10 yds past the LOS...to the 1st down marker.Yes, it didn’t make it to LOS
Lol. Smart move. Not riskyBears playing for the FG is risky
Leaving the offense in: also risky!Bears playing for the FG is risky
It's the bears my friendLol. Smart move. Not risky
When you're the Bears you take that risk.Bears playing for the FG is risky
True but there is no way he even knew a receiver was in the area, clear throw-away. But, rules are rules….No, there was a receiver in the area. The LOS thing only matters if he's outside the tackle box: if you're inside it and there's no receiver, it's grounding regardless.
That's all they need to play for. If a kicker can't make a 30 yard FG he needs to find a new job.I guess they don’t trust the QB….rather play for the FG.
Intent doesn't matter. QBs can airmail it 30 feet over a receiver's head but it ain't grounding.True but there is no way he even knew a receiver was in the area, clear throw-away. But, rules are rules….
If it was a longer FG I would hate it.I guess they don’t trust the QB….rather play for the FG.