OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,928
- Reaction score
- 22,450
We will have to agree to disagree. He has historically been a more productive receiver than Beasley, and if healthy there is no reason to believe he can’t at least dulicate what Beasley did last year. For that matter, as long as he is even in the ballpark of what Beasley produced that’s still well above any current option on the roster, which alone means would be more than just a token signing.Lol..I have missed you, OmerV. I have no problem disagreeing with you, and most of the time I do. But in this case I agree that they don't expect him to perform the way he did in his prime. I also believe his signing would be a token signing, because he wouldn't be as good as Beasley (IMO), and I don't see them cutting Hurns to save 5 mil even if they do sign him (which would make sense to do).