TwistedL0g1k
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,459
- Reaction score
- 3,796
The body of evidence proving Jerry's ineptitude has become overwhelming.
Most playoff wins since 2000
- Thread starter Hawkeye0202
- Start date
Nova
Ntegrase96
- Messages
- 10,903
- Reaction score
- 13,101
It was plausibly just bad luck/timing during the Romo years. But now it's just blatantly clear-- the FO can't build a playoff team.
StarOfGlory
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,108
- Reaction score
- 5,451
We are not finishing behind the Giants!
DandyDon52
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,263
- Reaction score
- 17,037
that wasnt the ref, it was ruled a catch initially.
It was ny office and blandino who overturned the call and said it was not a catch.
DandyDon52
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,263
- Reaction score
- 17,037
I disagree, both dak and romo were good enough, it was just jerry hired bad HC's.
Also they had a bad defense for the whole period till quinn got here and parsons rookie year,
and for 2 years they had a good defense, but MM blew it both years.
gtb1943
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,152
- Reaction score
- 9,069
you have to remember that the Jethro minions will always blame others for his ineptitude.
TwentyOne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,325
- Reaction score
- 5,793
Never have they tried to make us believe that it was the QBs fault.
In facrt they stated over and over again that they felt bad that they werent able to support Romo with enough talent to win something meaningful for them.
They stated the same for Dak just that they said they dont want that to happen (what happend with Romo) again.
The Joneses do a lot of PR rubbish. well mostly everything is actual. But they never have given their QBs the fault for the failure of the franchise. One of the main reasons for failure imo.
TwentyOne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,325
- Reaction score
- 5,793
Which teams are the most surprising to me ?
The ones behind us.
I cant believe that there are people out there who are able to do an even worse job than bluelable and chuckles.
Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,374
- Reaction score
- 50,920
I have a different perspective on the chart as a whole.....focusing on the teams that's won Super Bowl over the same timeline. If the goal is the Super Bowl, the teams who haven't won since 2000 are that much different from the Cowboys with only 4 playoff wins or the Packers or 49ers with 15 or 14 wins respectively. In other words, they are getting to playoffs and failing just as the Cowboys. I'm not making excuses for our pitiful post-season record but to see the Packs and 49er records with NO Super Bowl either gives a different perspective.
*Pats 6 Chiefs 2
*Bucs 2 Broncos 1
*Ravens 2 Seahawks 1
*Steelers 2 Colts 1
* Giants 2 Saints 1
* Eagles 2
2000s
- 2000: St. Louis Rams
- 2001: Baltimore Ravens
- 2002: New England Patriots
- 2003: Tampa Bay Buccaneers
- 2004: New England Patriots
- 2005: New England Patriots
- 2006: Pittsburgh Steelers
- 2007: Indianapolis Colts
- 2008: New York Giants
- 2009: Pittsburgh Steelers
2010s
- 2010: New Orleans Saints
- 2011: Green Bay Packers
- 2012: New York Giants
- 2013: Baltimore Ravens
- 2014: Seattle Seahawks
- 2015: New England Patriots
- 2016: Denver Broncos
- 2017: New England Patriots
- 2018: Philadelphia Eagles
- 2019: New England Patriots
2020s
- 2020: Kansas City Chiefs
- 2021: Tampa Bay Buccaneers
- 2022: Los Angeles Rams
- 2023: Kansas City Chiefs
- 2024: Philadelphia Eagles
TwentyOne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,325
- Reaction score
- 5,793
You just abstracted the data more.
Of course the primary goal is to win the SB. But that doesnt mean that all others who did less in the playoffs are the same from a strength point of view.
You can carry your approach even further and say only SB wins matter, not even season wins.
Then you will have only SB winners and the rest are teams that didnt achieve anything and so are the same.
But what do you get from turning detailed information into a true/false differentiation ?
The only thing you did is that you ignored valuable information.
There is a big difference between a team that won 20 playoff games during the last ten years and one team that did only win 2.
To ignore that would not help you if you want to find out why your team is bad.
Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,374
- Reaction score
- 50,920
This may be true but at the end of the day, they have accomplished their goal no more than the Cowboys over the same timeline.
Aerolithe_Lion
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,219
- Reaction score
- 13,446
JayFord
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,141
- Reaction score
- 22,115
You mean top 5 in defense?
Probably 3 or 4 times
Parcells had us as the number 1 D
And the 2009 D was top 5 I believe at number 2 or 3
pansophy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,192
- Reaction score
- 4,271
Seeing the Eagles and Chiefs as 2 and 3 made me look up Andy Reid. He is only 3 playoff wins behind Belicheat. He is going to go down as the best coach ever.
nalam
The realist
- Messages
- 12,049
- Reaction score
- 7,260
We should have taken advantage of of that nr 1 D , was it the year of that shiny ball slipping out Romo’s hand ?
2009 , unfortunately we ran into Giants I think
DZSierra
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,246
- Reaction score
- 972
Having moved to NC in 2001 and getting stuck having to watch the Panthers, that chart blew me away.
No way would I believe the Panthers have twice the playoff wins vs the cowboys since 2000.
Jerry just does a very nice job of mediocracy without having any major dumpster fires with a losing season sprinkled in from time to time.
No way would I believe the Panthers have twice the playoff wins vs the cowboys since 2000.
Jerry just does a very nice job of mediocracy without having any major dumpster fires with a losing season sprinkled in from time to time.
DZSierra
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,246
- Reaction score
- 972
I think Reid is already there.
Bill made his name known by only one team. He had a losing record in Cleveland.
Reid is the guy who kind of built Philly and KC when he came in.
