THUMPER
Papa
- Messages
- 9,522
- Reaction score
- 61
Every year I update a spreadsheet that calculates the success of each NFL franchise. I have one covering 1933-2006 (1933 was the start of regular schedules and a championship game) and another from 1966-2006 (the SuperBowl era).
The formula takes into consideration the number of years played, regular season record, years in the playoffs, playoff record, division titles, championship games played, SBs played, and SBs won. The goal is to discover which teams have had the most success making the playoffs, winning playoff games, winning their division, making it to the championship game, the SB, and winning the SB and it is weighted accordingly.
Here are the rankings for the SuperBowl era:
1. Cowboys
2. Steelers
3. 49ERs
4. Raiders
5. Dolphins
6. Broncos
7. Patriots
8. Commanders
9. Packers
10. Vikings
11. Rams
12. Colts
13. Giants
14. Bills
15. Ravens
16. Bears
17. Chiefs
18. Eagles
19. Bucs
20. Titans/Oilers
21. Jets
22. Browns
23. Panthers
24. Chargers
25. Bengals
26. Seahawks
27. Jaguars
28. Falcons
29. Saints
30. Lions
31. Cardinals
32. Texans
The Cardinals also rank 30th in the all-time rankings which is truly pitiful since they are one of the oldest teams in the league yet have the lowest success rating of any of the established teams having made the playoffs only 6 times in the last 74 years.
Compare that with the Cowboys who have made the playoffs 28 of the last 41 years.
The Browns rank #1 in the all-time rankings yet they are 22nd in the SB era because they haven't won anything since 1964.
I separate the all-time era from the SB era because prior to 1966 there weren't as many divisions and only a single playoff game (usually) to decide the champion. After 1966 there were at least 6 divisions and a couple of rounds of playoff games. It is unfair to compare the two eras. The Bears and Giants were almost always in the playoffs but only played a single game each time whereas the Cowboys played 2-3 every year that we made it. Also, a lot of the teams weren't around prior to 1966 and some that were are long gone.
I don't count the years prior to 1933 in the all-time rankings because teams played varying schedules (one team might play 17 games while another only played 6) and the championship was simply given to the team with the best record but since teams made their own schedules they would include several patsies to increase their winning %.
Beginning in 1933, the league made the schedules and a championship game was played between the two division winners to decide the champion. Some Packers fans cry about it because they were awarded 3 titles prior to 1933 and they aren't counted but that's just too bad. I'm not sure what they are griping about, they have the most titles anyway with 10 but still rank 3rd overall because they sucked for 30 years between SB wins.
If I knew how to post an Excel spreadsheet I would do it.
Enjoy...
The formula takes into consideration the number of years played, regular season record, years in the playoffs, playoff record, division titles, championship games played, SBs played, and SBs won. The goal is to discover which teams have had the most success making the playoffs, winning playoff games, winning their division, making it to the championship game, the SB, and winning the SB and it is weighted accordingly.
Here are the rankings for the SuperBowl era:
1. Cowboys
2. Steelers
3. 49ERs
4. Raiders
5. Dolphins
6. Broncos
7. Patriots
8. Commanders
9. Packers
10. Vikings
11. Rams
12. Colts
13. Giants
14. Bills
15. Ravens
16. Bears
17. Chiefs
18. Eagles
19. Bucs
20. Titans/Oilers
21. Jets
22. Browns
23. Panthers
24. Chargers
25. Bengals
26. Seahawks
27. Jaguars
28. Falcons
29. Saints
30. Lions
31. Cardinals
32. Texans
The Cardinals also rank 30th in the all-time rankings which is truly pitiful since they are one of the oldest teams in the league yet have the lowest success rating of any of the established teams having made the playoffs only 6 times in the last 74 years.
Compare that with the Cowboys who have made the playoffs 28 of the last 41 years.
The Browns rank #1 in the all-time rankings yet they are 22nd in the SB era because they haven't won anything since 1964.
I separate the all-time era from the SB era because prior to 1966 there weren't as many divisions and only a single playoff game (usually) to decide the champion. After 1966 there were at least 6 divisions and a couple of rounds of playoff games. It is unfair to compare the two eras. The Bears and Giants were almost always in the playoffs but only played a single game each time whereas the Cowboys played 2-3 every year that we made it. Also, a lot of the teams weren't around prior to 1966 and some that were are long gone.
I don't count the years prior to 1933 in the all-time rankings because teams played varying schedules (one team might play 17 games while another only played 6) and the championship was simply given to the team with the best record but since teams made their own schedules they would include several patsies to increase their winning %.
Beginning in 1933, the league made the schedules and a championship game was played between the two division winners to decide the champion. Some Packers fans cry about it because they were awarded 3 titles prior to 1933 and they aren't counted but that's just too bad. I'm not sure what they are griping about, they have the most titles anyway with 10 but still rank 3rd overall because they sucked for 30 years between SB wins.
If I knew how to post an Excel spreadsheet I would do it.
Enjoy...