Moulds for Glover or Ellis?

[vlad]

He is 32, but I'd make the trade and cut Keyashawn.

No disrespect, but to me that is one of the worst ideas I have ever heard of.

You want to trade a very good but not great DE or one of the top DT in the league and cut probably the best possession receiver in the game for Eric Moulds? I'm a big Moulds fan but no way in hell would I do that.


WR is not our problem, it hasn't been our problem this year with the exception of the lost progress from when Crayton was hurt. These guys may be old but they aren't showing the signs of age, in fact Glenn had the healthiest year of his career.

I don't understand anyone who can't see this isn't all about the o-line. A good line would improve not only everything on offense, you don't think a less tired Roy or Keith Davis are more active? You don't think a less worn out D-line and LB corp plays the run stronger?

Its all about the o-line to me. Our skill positions match up well with anyone in the league imho.

 

[neosapien23]

I agree vlad. That is why we should go oline in the first and second rounds. I do think Moulds is a better reciever than Johnson. We probably won't get draft picks for Glover and Ellis, because teams know we will not pay that much for rotation players. I do not want Glover or Ellis to play for either Washington or Philly. They would kill us 2x a year, especially Glover. Bledsoe does not throw to Keyshawn. He doesn't feel right forcing throws. Thats why Glenn gets more passes even in the red zone. I think Moulds would work better than Keyshawn with Bledsoe at quarterback.

 

[CF74]

no way