xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,202
- Reaction score
- 64,711
Why would you cut a guy if you had guaranteed money invested in him?
Yep, his 2016 base salary of 7M is guaranteed.
Why would you cut a guy if you had guaranteed money invested in him?
I honestly don't see it that way at all. I think he's just feeling the after affects of nearly 500 touches last season. He's not Emmitt or Dickerson, so the odds were he was going to pay for those carries this year.
Is or isn't... we will never know.
What we do know though is that going back to college, he has had numerous nicks and pulls that have kept him out of a significant number of games. And we know that last year was the first season that he ever played when he didn't miss significant time.
To me this is a direct result of his hurdle over one of our players. That motion is not normal, and puts a different stretch on the hammy as compared to running. Showboating in that regard got the best of him.
To me this is a direct result of his hurdle over one of our players. That motion is not normal, and puts a different stretch on the hammy as compared to running. Showboating in that regard got the best of him.
The guaranteed money is a sunk cost. You're paying it to him whether he's on the team or not. It shouldn't factor into your decision at all: if the team is better off without him, then cut him.Why would you cut a guy if you had guaranteed money invested in him?
The guaranteed money is a sunk cost. You're paying it to him whether he's on the team or not. It shouldn't factor into your decision at all: if the team is better off without him, then cut him.
Of course it's more complicated than that in the NFL because of the cap and dead money considerations. It's much clearer in, say, MLB. But it's amazing how many sports teams just don't seem to get the concept of sunk costs.
And the most obvious. I don't see how anybody could've watched us run him into the ground last year (23 touches against WAS in a meaningless week 17 game?) and thought we were going to even consider signing him. The decision had long since been made.Demarco may be the best non signing FA in Cowboy history
I said nothing of the kind. The question I answered was, "Why would you cut a player if you had guaranteed money invested in him?"You really think they are better off without him? That's blindness
All of that bragging that Philly fans did in getting him amounts to nothing so far.
Interesting the only season that he made it a full year was when he was playing for a new contract
Was there an over/under on games played before he got hurt?
He figured his smoothies would help...