And this btw was taken from their official site,
"Artists—a group encompassing performers, composers and/or musicians—become eligible for induction 25 years after the release of their first record. Besides demonstrating unquestionable musical excellence and talent, inductees will have had a significant impact on the development, evolution and preservation of rock & roll"
Now tell me again why Green Day and Joan Jett got in{among many others}.
They shouldn't make it anyways, if they let them in they might as well induct Foreigner and Styx next yr.
I think they want to get visitors in. Reason Tupac goes in. Gotta get that cash flowing.
LIKEI think ELO and Journey deserve to be in there.
I love Tupac but he does not belong in the rock in roll hall of fame.
If it is the Rap Hall of fame...sure.
If you even broaden it out to the Music Hall of Fame...sure.
The Rock n Roll hall of fame...no.
Pearl JamDebatable, some like boring, uninspired wuss rock but it just isn't my cup of tea. If you are going to put in any "Seattle" band put in Alice in Chains whom in my opinion were much better then PJ or that other worthless band that {helped} introduce Dave Grohl and Courtney Love to the world.
And still no Judas Priest.........
As noted above this is a purely money-making endeavor.
They intentionally leave groups/artists out so they can use them later in thin years when they need draws.
No sense even getting offended as less than half the bands would qualify as "rock and roll".
Arguing with 30-40 year old women that Journey is not "classic rock" has beaten the life out of me.
they are certainly better.I'd put both Alice in Chains and Soundgarden above Pearl Jam.
I'd put both Alice in Chains and Soundgarden above Pearl Jam.