My (biased) thoughts on Martellus Bennett

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
windward;2055098 said:
It's kinda funny how people are generally in favor of a BPA strategy until it actually happens.

Funny you mention that, considering we passed on the BPA withour very first pick.

That door swings both ways.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,683
Reaction score
4,539
skinsscalper;2055201 said:
Funny you mention that, considering we passed on the BPA withour very first pick.

That door swings both ways.
It's debatable, really considering that Felix Jones went about where he was expected to go. Jenkins certainly was the BPA and so was Bennett imo


There were no reaches and we picked players that fit our scheme very well.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
windward;2055247 said:
It's debatable, really considering that Felix Jones went about where he was expected to go. Jenkins certainly was the BPA and so was Bennett imo


There were no reaches and we picked players that fit our scheme very well.

Debatable? Jerry Jones admitted himself Mendenhall was rated higher on their own freaking board!

Find me one scouting report that rates Jones higher than Mendenhall.

Gosselin (whom many consider the be all end all in this evaluation business) had him Mendenhall rated as the TENTH BEST PLAYER.

Just because you choose to debate it doesn't make it debatable (at least on any rational level).
 

Big Dakota

New Member
Messages
11,876
Reaction score
0
big dog cowboy;2055222 said:
This is a much better pick than most realize.


I know what Jesse would say:)

ventura_predator.jpg
 

DT101

Member
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
Can he catch a ball thrown right in his hands on the goal line in a big playoff game? If so then he is an upgrade to Tuna's buffoon Fasano. Actually a guy with his size and leaping ability will be a monster in short yardage goal line situations. Throw it high and let him get it!!!!
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,683
Reaction score
4,539
skinsscalper;2055326 said:
Debatable? Jerry Jones admitted himself Mendenhall was rated higher on their own freaking board!

Find me one scouting report that rates Jones higher than Mendenhall.

Gosselin (whom many consider the be all end all in this evaluation business) had him Mendenhall rated as the TENTH BEST PLAYER.

Just because you choose to debate it doesn't make it debatable (at least on any rational level).
But was Jones a reach? No. Just because he may have been a higher rated player does not necessarily means he's a better fit here.

For example, everyone would agee that Jeremy Shockey is more talented than Kevin Boss. One could make the argument that Boss is overall a better fit for what the Giants want to do (and who could argue with the results?)

The question of whether Jones or Mendenhall is the better fit here is very much debateable.
 

the kid 05

Individuals play the game, but teams beat the odds
Messages
9,543
Reaction score
3
you got into A&M?...how much did you pay them

thanks for your imput :)
 

AlterEgo

Active Member
Messages
334
Reaction score
163
I'll admit that I didn't want Bennett but after thinking about it, I think the Cowboys got the best value for the pick. It's starting to grow on me. I still want a WR though.

My only worry is his route running. Knowing A&M's offense he was probably asked to run a 10 yd hook pattern and wait at the same spot until the play was over.
 

gbrittain

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,126
Reaction score
67
Chocolate Lab;2055715 said:
Sig-worthy.

Don't you think it is debatable that Bennett was indeed the BPA considering we just traded Fasano a day ago?

To me that pick looks more like a need than BPA.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,114
Reaction score
11,466
gbrittain;2055783 said:
Don't you think it is debatable that Bennett was indeed the BPA considering we just traded Fasano a day ago?

To me that pick looks more like a need than BPA.
Actually, no. Mickey was saying all day that the team expected Tony Curtis to beat out Fasano this year anyway. In other words, Fasano was useless. And the team thought Curtis could actually play.

But to answer it another way, if Bennett had been picked two choices before us, would we still have taken a TE? I don't think so.

More evidence... We wanted a WR even more than a TE, but the value wasn't there, so we didn't force it.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
gbrittain;2055783 said:
Don't you think it is debatable that Bennett was indeed the BPA considering we just traded Fasano a day ago?

To me that pick looks more like a need than BPA.

Wade said they wanted Sweed at 61 but Pittsburgh took him at 54. There was no more value at WR. People forget there are 31 other teams drafting and plans change on the fly.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
windward;2055098 said:
It's kinda funny how people are generally in favor of a BPA strategy until it actually happens.

well those that whine usually whine regardless of what happens. it's just what they do.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
i flippin hate the aggies........however, I was clapping and cheering this pick.

at 61 there wasnt much value left on the board without reaching.....I think we got the best and most complete TE in the draft.....

I think next year our 2 TE sets will be completely deadly.....since Bennett is a better player than Fasano.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
Bennett was one of the top players in the country coming out of high school.

He played in that awful tamu offense and was the team's leading WR the past 2 seasons.

From his nfl.com anaylsis:

probably the only guy in the country to AVERAGE 5 knockdown blocks and 4 catches PER game...

This guy is 6'6" plus, weighs 250 and runs a 4.68. That is serious athleticism.

From an athleticism standpoint he is in another league from Fasano who was simply an adequate blocker who lacked any real outstanding abilities and was being passed on the depth chart by Tony Curtis.
 

Ashwynn

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,777
Reaction score
500
gbrittain;2055008 said:
I hate the pick, unless this guy is good enough to put Jason Witten on the bench...I will not hold my breath.

Fasano was not great by any stretch...he was a mistake to begin with, but he was serviceable. so we draft a short two years ago, trade him and another player for a 4th, and turn around and draft another TE. I can not envision how that makes sense to anyone.

Hate, hate, hate the pick.

Its not about replacing Witten. Its about giving Romo more weapons to chose which way you die. More options on scrambles. More ways to win. Run a 2 TE offense with two Wittens and it becomes more effective. You shoudl be excited.
 
Top