my revised draft

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
Dan The Cowboys Fan said:
Dont immediatly write off Patrick Crayton. He is going to come into his own next season, after recovering fully from his broken ankle that limited his production late in the season. Plus, with the addition of TO, Patrick is bound to get tons better from the mentoring and leadership TO provides.

I'm not writing off Patrick Crayton. I think this next year he'll be a nice #3 receiver. However, if Glenn goes down again, I don't feel comfortable with Copper as a #3. Just to take precautions, I would love to have a WR corps look like this

1. Terrell Owens
2. Terry Glenn
3. Patrick Crayton
4. Maurice Stovall

if T.Glenn goes down, we have Owens, Crayton, and Stovall.

By no means do I want to get rid of Crayton, he's really grown on me.
 

bobbie brewskie

New Member
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
DragonCowboy said:
I'm not writing off Patrick Crayton. I think this next year he'll be a nice #3 receiver. However, if Glenn goes down again, I don't feel comfortable with Copper as a #3. Just to take precautions, I would love to have a WR corps look like this

1. Terrell Owens
2. Terry Glenn
3. Patrick Crayton
4. Maurice Stovall

if T.Glenn goes down, we have Owens, Crayton, and Stovall.

By no means do I want to get rid of Crayton, he's really grown on me.

the only problem i have with Stovall at the #4 is the fact that Parcells likes his #4 reciever to be a better special teamer than an actual WR, and stovall, eh . . . and i dont see us using a pick on him either, wasted IMO.
 

neosapien23

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,903
Reaction score
171
DragonCowboy said:
Martin Nance sounds good. IMO, we could take alot of 3rd round WRs. You have good information about Nance, and yes, Stovall has work issues. He's a lazy player, but we know Parcells can whip him into shape. Stovall's been touted by many as the most underrated WR, and comparisons have been made to Randy Moss. Stovall's issues have always worried me, so I would be more than happy with Martin Nance. Thanks for the input, it sounds really good. I'll look for Nance's name in the draft!

I think he compares more to the bigger recievers like Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald. Stovall is extremely physically gifted, but lacks Randy Moss like speed. He ran a 4.61 at the combine and that was on an extremely fast surface.
 

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
DragonCowboy said:
3a. Babatunde Oshinowo NT (I've read about him, his only knock is that he needs to pack on the pounds)...

The thing about Babatunde is that he's WILDLY rated (some rating him into the second round, others rating him as a second day prospect). This is one guy you're going to have to decide you love and pick above where 75-80% of people think he should be rated. And you're going to have to be right about it. :(

David.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
bobbie brewskie said:
i stopped reading after i read "Round 2 - D. Bullocks" he is a freaking SS, unless you want to have 5 SS on our roster next year we dont want Bullocks. lets draft a true FS for once instead of trying to groom a SS into a FS.

Bullocks could play both FS and SS, he's always aroudn the football, has man-to-man coverage experience, and can cover in the deep zone
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
ghst187 said:
Yes Bullocks is more of a SS, and taking him that high would be a reach for his talent level, same for Matua.

many are saying that Bullocks could go as high as his brother Josh did last year, 2nd round, he's definitely rising, and did you hear about Matua's workout? he was very quick for a 300 lb. man
 
Top