My thoughts on the Cooks trade

darthseinfeld

Groupthink Guru
Messages
33,267
Reaction score
37,872
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
-Very weird we got him for a 5th and 2024 6th, when the in season ask was supposedly a 1st

- Short term fix. Probably here for two years.

-WR wasnt likely at 26, but it should absolutely be on the table later if there is a guy they like. See above

- I wanted Hopkins above other WR's. Cooks does however fit #2 WR to a T

- He has been a very consistent player throughout his career. Fully healthy seasons have seen lows of 65 and highs of 90 in receptions. 75-1100 seems typical production.

-TD production is margin. Had a career high of 9 in 2015, but 5 or 6 seems the norm
 

DanA

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,988
Reaction score
5,804
The good thing about Cooks is he allows us to back Tolbert, Gallup or a mid-round draft pick to be WR3 but we aren’t relying on any one of them. We have a lot more freedom in the draft now. I think it might be one of the TE’s or RB’s we draft which to me isn’t a bad thing.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,457
Reaction score
11,571
-Very weird we got him for a 5th and 2024 6th, when the in season ask was supposedly a 1st

- Short term fix. Probably here for two years.

-WR wasnt likely at 26, but it should absolutely be on the table later if there is a guy they like. See above

- I wanted Hopkins above other WR's. Cooks does however fit #2 WR to a T

- He has been a very consistent player throughout his career. Fully healthy seasons have seen lows of 65 and highs of 90 in receptions. 75-1100 seems typical production.

-TD production is margin. Had a career high of 9 in 2015, but 5 or 6 seems the norm
Dallas has seemed to put a emphasis on boring players who just do their job. Something this team needs. Too many players last yr start reading their press clips as the yr went on.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,718
Reaction score
28,569
In what is considered a weak draft in regards to depth, you have to give the front office credit for trading away late picks for proven players
Both were comp picks as well.

The case could be made that’s the right thing to do….every year if you have them.

You can only develop so many players at once when you’re trying to win, so drafting 10 players is a waste unless you’re in full rebuild mode.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,677
Reaction score
19,909
-Very weird we got him for a 5th and 2024 6th, when the in season ask was supposedly a 1st

- Short term fix. Probably here for two years.

-WR wasnt likely at 26, but it should absolutely be on the table later if there is a guy they like. See above

- I wanted Hopkins above other WR's. Cooks does however fit #2 WR to a T

- He has been a very consistent player throughout his career. Fully healthy seasons have seen lows of 65 and highs of 90 in receptions. 75-1100 seems typical production.

-TD production is margin. Had a career high of 9 in 2015, but 5 or 6 seems the norm
He is an excellent fit to our offense and adds much needed speed. He also is healthy, not coming off of an acl like OBJ.
 

Silverz1972

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
2,243
Wiped out cb and wr out of high picks. Imo

Te, ol, dt, rb are options now for high picks.

Wouldn’t rule out a wr like boutte in 4th.
 

stinkface

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,423
Reaction score
2,376
I still think we pick a TE and let Schultz hit the road. He's a receiving TE who works the middle and has a feel for getting open. He doesn't block and he isn't strong enough to break tackles. Sure he's got value, but if we are truly going to run the ball more we need a TE who can do it all. I still think if the Texas running back is there we pick him. Running Backs sell Jerseys and I'd think Bijan will be O rookie of the year wherever he ends up.
 
Top