NASA Scientists Might Have Found a Parallel Universe 'Next to Ours' After an Antarctica Experiment

[Runwildboys]

The Van Allen belt is no problem.And why would there be a crater under the lunar module ?

He thinks the retro rockets would have created one upon landing, as if the surface of the moon is five feet of dust or something.

 

[PJTHEDOORS]

He thinks the retro rockets would have created one upon landing, as if the surface of the moon is five feet of dust or something.

Nasa never lies.

 

[Hoofbite]

Please don't tell me we have moon landing deniers here.

Oh, boy! You're in for a treat.

 

[Hoofbite]

Nasa never lies.

Lol.

Special contact lenses.

 

[Runwildboys]

Nasa never lies.

I've seen this before. It's garbage. Just look at the very first "example". It's be impossible to rotate sideways through the wires he's supposedly using.

I find it hilarious that so many of the people who believe this crap that YouTube conspiracy theorists are selling have the balls to call the rest of us "sheep".

Another thing: Just because it's possible to fake zero G with today's technology doesn't mean they actually do. They certainly didn't have this tech 50 years ago.

In a prior post, you cited "evidence" that the Russians could have been willing to allow the U.S. to get away with faking the moon landing because they wanted to have joint ventures in space missions. So why do you believe we're still not in space?

 

[Hoofbite]

I've seen this before. It's garbage. Just look at the very first "example". It's be impossible to rotate sideways through the wires he's supposedly using.

I find it hilarious that so many of the people who believe this crap that YouTube conspiracy theorists are selling have the balls to call the rest of us "sheep".

Another thing: Just because it's possible to fake zero G with today's technology doesn't mean they actually do. They certainly didn't have this tech 50 years ago.

In a prior post, you cited "evidence" that the Russians could have been willing to allow the U.S. to get away with faking the moon landing because they wanted to have joint ventures in space missions. So why do you believe we're still not in space?

The 2nd one is better. The guy reaches to grab the guy flipping without even looking and snags his pocket with his pinkie. You can see his pinkie in the pocket. This is evidence of wires, I guess because if you were to attach wires to someone to fake zero gravity it would most definitely be on their pockets.

 

[The Fonz]

We found this we found that...the usual monthly NASA BS

 

[Runwildboys]

We found this we found that...the usual monthly NASA BS

They made no claims.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

The 2nd one is better. The guy reaches to grab the guy flipping without even looking and snags his pocket with his pinkie. You can see his pinkie in the pocket. This is evidence of wires, I guess because if you were to attach wires to someone to fake zero gravity it would most definitely be on their pockets.

Exactly.

And what of all the impromptu experiments that we’ve seen in these types of videos showing astronauts playing with floating water, chips, et cetera?

CGI, complex miniature wires on each individual Cheeto, lol?

What I see is a bunch of people floating in space (which is unnatural to humans) trying to conduct interviews in front of a camera standing still. Of course their movements are going to be strange.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

If you're actually interested in this topic. Ethan Siegel has written an article in Forbes about it and throws some shade at the media's hyperbole around it.

“In fact, there’s an extraordinary piece of evidence that disfavors them coming through the Earth: the IceCube neutrino detector exists, and if high-energy tau neutrinos are regularly passing through the Earth (and the Antarctic ice), IceCube would have definitively seen a signal. And, quite unambiguously, they have not.“

Call me skeptical, but I hardly doubt this rapper/actor can be counted on to see the signal.

 

[The Fonz]

They made no claims.

for $22.6 billion a year the return is not that great

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

for $22.6 billion a year the return is not that great

If you want national security and telecommunications up and running at 100% the return is great. So which do you prefer to lose?

 

[Runwildboys]

for $22.6 billion a year the return is not that great

I think you may want to research all the things the world has, thanks to NASA's ingenuity and development. Medical and technological advances are far beyond what they'd be without the space program.

 

[Williamsboys]

I just hope I'm alot better looking over there.