nate newton talks about cowboys & pacman very interesting stuff

[zrinkill]

Pac Was A Joke

IRONNN ....... ehhhh nevermind ...... you are actually right this time.

 

[Big Country]

I wouldn't bring him back as a concession salesperson. He's not worthy to grace the uniform.

 

[jobberone]

i don't care about his attitude ... pacman proved he no longer has the talent or skills required to play cb in the nfl.

not to mention we thought he would in the very least help us big time at punt returner and he was equally inept at that position as well.

let pacman stick to pro's vs. joe's

All his crap is well.....crap. I agree; I don't care about his attitude. He was liked well enough last year by those who matter. It's not his fault they started him after the suspension. OTOH, I'd bet big money there are some resentful of the distractions and problems caused by his incident and suspension last year.

When people say they overlook player's past as in stabbing a teammate and doping and getting arrested, I have a hard time understanding that and the hate on Pacman. What's the difference. Don't cry attitude and then praise another player's fiery approach or level of talent when off field they are essentially alike.

It all boils down to 1) can he contribute enough to warrant a roster spot and 2) will he so something to take away enough of any contribution? He's got athletic talent. And he can play CB. He also is so undisciplined he makes too many mistakes, isn't coachable enough (IMO), and give up too many plays. If he got 10 INTs or so then all is forgiven. Well, almost. If he takes several to the house INTs or PRs then all is forgiven. Well, almost.

Pacman should be a business decision factoring in all the negatives.

Personally, I'd go with what we have here and leave him alone. It does send the wrong message. OTOH, his situation can be spinned well enough assuming he plays well. I don't see this as a nobrainer either way.

 

[JonJon]

Its strange how many issues of past players gain approval by the same people who say Pacman is a troublemaker?

Strange indeed. The answer is obvious though.

 

[jobberone]

Strange indeed. The answer is obvious though.

Yes. If he could stay on the field and play at a HOF level no one would think about not playing or signing him. They would either not care or overlook his shortcomings.

The has the athletic talent to play at that level. He just doesn't have enough mental capacity to do it consistently. That's what it appears like.

 

[dcfanatic]

That was my point as well. Bring Pacman back as a 4th cb only. He is a good insurance policy.

Suspended players aren't good insurance policies.

They are liabilities.

 

[cowboyjoe]

Suspended players aren't good insurance policies.

They are liabilities.

thats true DC because if you resign pacman and he gets into trouble could cost you draft picks, along with money the commissioner goodell said

my thinking was, since jerry jones mentioned that sunday morning article about bringing him back, then what nate netwon said, then what the calvin article stated that pacman is living in a house owned by jerry jones

maybe im adding up things, and coming up with wrong answer but to me looks like jery jones is seriously thinking about bringing him back,, could be what jerry jones is thinking about is punt returns with pacman, since they are still having problems with trying to find a good punt returner;

again, i dont want him baack, because to me he has a bad attitude and that showed on pros and joes,