tm1119
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,941
- Reaction score
- 8,681
Because I saw more from Wilcox to suggest he gets it more than Webb. Wilcox had injury issues but was very good in the first Philadelphia game. He needs a lot of refinement.
Webb was tentative whenever he got on the field and his role was not that great that it should have been overwhelming but it was. When we signed Sterling Moore back, we got a little better. Not really even because Moore has better physical skills but he has a better mentality. Webb looks soft and played that way.
I am not suggesting Wilcox is a world beater.
I just think getting that extra slot/versatile DB who could do multiple roles between CB/S is more valuable than just drafting Wilcox's replacement to pair with Church. I can say based off last season, Wilcox has a better chance to develop into a player than Webb who looked like he did not want to play hard at times.
A large part of team building is getting players to know their jobs, even if it is very specific, and do it very well.
I'm not disagreeing on a versatile s/cb being very useful for our team, I'm a big fan of Exum in the later rounds. But I disagree on Wilcox showing much, if anything, as a coverage FS. He looked lost and was out of position a ton. He showed his athleticism and ability to chase and tackle well, but I saw nothing to say that he should be the starting FS. If we had a safety already that I felt comfortable with in coverage I would have no problem with Wilcox starting, but Church sure ain't that guy.
Haha, Ward, and Brooks are the only guys I see as being viable day 1 FS's though so this conversation is probably pointless anyway.