New poll post suspension/nonsuspension "Suh in a Cowboys uniform"

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,512
Reaction score
6,476
Lord of the


Lord of the flies incarnate.

0qw7zyL.gif
 

Seven

Messenger to the football Gods
Messages
19,301
Reaction score
9,892
If Suh makes the team better you take him. Screw the morality police.



Then they can throw caution to the wind and troll the prison system for talent. They'd have to weed out the ones with morals, of course.
I want to win. I'm greedy, I'm a fan. I don't want


It's the fact I love winning. I'm a fan. I have full faith should whomever we bring in will help this team more.

Yes he's a scumbag, but he can push the pocket too. ;)

Uhhh......we are winning, dude.
 

bracey

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,002
Reaction score
57
Testing the waters here on who still thinks we should make a move for Suh next season. Now would seem to be a good time.

Yea or nay? What say ye?

With the salary cap, I can't say I'm knowledgable enough about the entire situation to say if we should or shouldn't. And how close he probably is to a multi-game suspension should be part of the math. But outside of those issues, I would love to have him wearing the star. He's an awesome football player.
 

spook930

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
650
No. I'm not going to even worry about him coming here because we won't be able to afford him.
 

Nirvana

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
12,309
At the right price I'd take him but that won't be the case - at all. Will roll with Brent and Crawford in the middle, backed up by T. McClain and... (draft, cheaper FA)
 

Leadbelly

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,174
Reaction score
1,592
A Suh rarely hits the market BUT I don't think he could ever provide enough from the 1T DT spot to match the $13M to $15M cap value he'll likely command and I don't think we're looking to move Crawford from the 3T. I think you can draft someone in round 1 or 2 and get similar production from a deeper rotation rather than 1 person. I'd rather go after JPP.

That said, much like T.O. and Haley, I don't have an issue signing the occasional problem child if they're among the best in the game at their position and the position can influence the game.

Not really interested in Peterson, but mainly because he's hitting 30 and I don't think he'll be much of a discount from Murray.
 

George

a legend in your own mind
Messages
1,177
Reaction score
549
I would rather seek the talented hungry no names that could be trained instead of overpaying bad attitude overpaid "stars".
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAZ

WPBCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,265
Reaction score
6,532
Suh and AP? It all depends on cost and who we have or dont have on our roster. I dont really want scumbags wearing the star but we've had em before and will most likely have some again. I want to win and Im tired of the futility year after year. If they can help us win and fit into the Process then it would be foolish not have one or both.
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
ive thought about it...and i decided

if they can be afforded, if they improve the position they will play, and if they will help us win rings...then do it.

we once signed pacman jones, and no players in the league right now is worse morally than he is.

do it if you can.
 

egn22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,884
Reaction score
2,102
I was for AP w the idea being we'd get a discount. Suh will require top dollar and if that's the case Id prefer to build in the draft so we can use that money to keep our own people.
 

Fredd

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,995
Reaction score
2,238
I do not have a good opinion regarding him, don't suh me over it
 

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
6,347
If Suh makes the team better you take him. Screw the morality police.

It's not "morality" for all those who don't want him. It's called "risk aversion". Do you honestly think that you can count on Suh to not get suspended? Please don't say that you could say that about every player, because you can't. Suh has a definite history of this kind of play. Hell, he almost didn't get to play in the playoff game against us this week because of his tactics. As I said before, it's not a matter of "if", but "when" with him. I'm not gutting my cap for that kind of risk. Someone will, but I'd rather it not be the Cowboys. He has a $70M body and a $70 brain.
 

pancakeman

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,173
Reaction score
2,861
Nay. I'm all for guys, who will fight for you in the trenches but not for pieces of garbage who knowingly try to injure other players & act innocent when they get caught doing it.

Yeah, I almost think the blatant load-of-poo excuses he gives after the fact speak worse of the player than the actions themselves.
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,529
Reaction score
29,874
Yes to Suh, no to AP, yes to Gordon. Price has to be right, particularly Gordon.
 

Vegas_Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,348
Reaction score
7,614
Nope. Keep this team headed in the right direction. That and I would rather spend that money on 2 or 3 good free agents instead of 1 great one.

Let some other team break the bank for that headache.
 
Top