I still can't comprehend this....
Of course not, because you want to argue from a biased conclusion.
You suggested Wilson kept up with Dak because of the cowboys secondary, which Dak did not help.
So, the inverse is also true, Dak kept up with Wilson because of the giants secondary, which Wilson did not help.
Here it is more simply for you:
If wilson kept up with dak because the cowboys secondary sucked, then dak kept up with wilson because the giants secondary sucked.
In other words, you cant praise Dak for his play without also praising Wilson for his play.
Instead, you attacked the cowboys secondary to avoid this conclusion.