FiveRings;4986405 said:
I agree with your assessment of Dubinsky, but I'm sorry you get Aniimov in a good position, with line mates he's familiar with, he could have at least 25 goals. You're also forgetting the Rags letting a good forward like Fedotenko who played so well under Torts walk, and in the same division to boot.
But I don't understand the fixation the Rangers had on getting Nash anyway, given their trap style why go for such explosive, defensively challenged forwards? Adding a good blue liner should have been their point of focus. MacDonugh Girardi and Staal can't carry the D corp the entire season.
Anisimov might get you 25 goals, but through his entire career here he has never been consistent enough to do so...he's never even hit 20. And there's no reason that Kreider, can't replace that.
Fedotenko was awful last year, 0 burst, 0 hands...solid on the PK was about it. Nash is actually a terrific defensive forward and one of the best penalty killers in the game. He doesn't always get heavily involved in the forecheck, but that's maybe the only flaw to his defensive game.
Defensively, you're leaving out Michael Del Zotto who has some flaws in his own zone, but is tremendous offensively, and Stralman who is solid overall. If Sauer, who is a top 4 defenseman on every team in the league comes back, its the best corps in the league. As it is, the Rangers might have the best top 4 in the game. Injuries might cause significant problems, because there isn't a ton of depth, but as a whole, the d corps is pretty much as good as it gets.