- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
WarC;3215749 said:Mike Jenkins played a terrible game. His second INT partly redeemed an otherwise craptastic performance.
You're just nuts.
WarC;3215749 said:Mike Jenkins played a terrible game. His second INT partly redeemed an otherwise craptastic performance.
WarC;3215793 said:I know, my critical comments here are usually universally condemned. Used to it. Don't care.
That said, to my eyes, Jenkins was the one mistake-prone player I noticed in this game.
He gave up more than one good gainer, slipped a few times, lost that first INT when he should have gone to the ground, and was responsible for one penalty that I can recall.
forever22;3215934 said:I don't want to hear that it was a simple mistake or that the game was over. It was a dumb mistake. One that could change a game, if done at the wrong time or place.
Sarge;3216073 said:Jenkins will never do that again - lesson learned but why was TNew encouraging it? That bothers me more.
stilltheguru;3216082 said:But, it didn't happen at the wrong time or place. Y'all need to cut that dude some slack. Why don't you rethink the year he has had and where we would be if he didn't take that next step and come off of that ledge.
Sarge;3216087 said:Saying it was a dumb mistake (which it WAS), has nothing to do with, and is no reflection on what kind of year he had.
stilltheguru;3216090 said:It does when you are *****ing about something that happened with a 20 point lead. Much more stupid is Wittens penalties which I don't see any threads about.
sk0aL;3216097 said:I give him a pass on it (although I was swearing at the TV when he did it), because I truly feel had the score been much closer than it was he wouldn't have done it.
Every single man, woman, and child in that stadium knew the Cowboys were well on their way to the franchise's biggest win in 13 years. He probably thought "why the hell not".
Jon88;3215370 said:This is not backyard football. That really pissed me off, sir.
RainMan;3215943 said:Me and my friend were wondering wth he was thinking. But my homeristic reaction is this:
He made the boneheaded decision with, what, a 20 or 27 point lead? But he'll never make that lateral again. And you know what, had he not made it tonight, maybe he inexplicably makes it next week in a tight game. I think it turns out to be a nice lesson learned in a spot where we didn't lose anything by him learning it.
My two cents.
Sarge;3216103 said:Uh - they could have had a 50 point lead - it was still NOT the thing to do. Pretty simple concept - or so I thought.