If I'm wrong then how come you questioned the play? If it was an obvious clear cut PI then how come you didn't say it was a PI in your original post instead of waiting for opinions before you gave yours? You've been here long enough to know what the majority opinion is going to be. lol In your original post you said "notice the location of the ball in the air when the LB hits Brown." The location of the ball in the air was behind Brown, which enabled the LB who had been beaten to catch up and hit Brown breaking up the pass.
Had Dak thrown the ball in the proper location out in front of Brown and put a little more on it, the LB never comes in contact with Brown until after he catches the ball and crosses the goalline for a TD. For your information that play had no affect on the outcome of the game. While the rest of the board was celebrating the big win after that game what were you doing questioning that play? If all you're going to fire back with are insults don't bother responding.
My comments were more about how absurd you come across than an insult per se.
You proclaim yourself to be correct when you have no basis for that claim. It's about 20 to 1 of posters saying it was interference.
I think almost everyone agrees that it was not a good pass; however, that's not relevant unless it was un-catchable.
It's unfortunate that few people understand the concept of Parliamentary Debate (The official term for Debate Club competitions).
In debate competitions you can't just declare yourself to be correct. The judges would laugh you out of the room. We don't have judges here but it becomes obvious which posters make good arguments and which ones present evidence to support their
premise.
Anybody that claims to be correct based on nothing or claims of "look at my post history" are going to be mocked and ridiculed. ANYBODY can claim to be correct. Everybody that has posted here for very long is likely to have been correct about something in the past.
You specifically have a history of confrontation and a history of claiming to be correct while rarely providing any convincing arguments.
You’ll have to go back to the 2014 regular season when I picked Seattle to beat the Cowboys to find a missed call by me. Training camp will be opening in a few weeks and here you are starting a thread crying with several others over a no call in a game the Cowboys won. LOL That’s a true testament to how sad this fan base is. You didn’t even bother to give your opinion on the no call in your original post. You just linked a video and said notice the location of the ball in the air when the LB hits Brown. You never claimed it was a PI because you weren’t sure, you wanted to hear everyone else’s opinion before you weighed in. If it was an obvious PI you wouldn’t have questioned it.The fact is it was debatable and under the new rule that play would not have been changed to a PI if reviewed.
