Nors Top 120 - 1st pass

junk

junk

I've got moxie
Messages
9,294
Reaction score
247
Nors said:
Whatever. I guess the "****" stuff he slings flies in this thread........ Gotcha - guess thats just fine - who needs rules.
Click to expand...

Where are the forum rules anyway? Do they apply to PMs as well? :lmao2:
 
Hostile

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
junk said:
Where are the forum rules anyway? Do they apply to PMs as well? :lmao2:
Click to expand...

http://dallascowboyszone.com/forums/announcement.php?f=37

PMs shouldn't be offensive, threatening, or vulgar, just like the forums.

We did ban a poster one time for making threats of physical harm and racial overtones to another poster. Naturally we rely on the integrity of the posters not to do that. If it happens there's no way we can know about it without it being reported.

I'm not crazy about the use of ****, or *** and I do and will ask posters not to use them.
 

Rush 2112

New Member
Messages
1,496
Reaction score
0
Hostile said:
http://dallascowboyszone.com/forums/announcement.php?f=37

PMs shouldn't be offensive, threatening, or vulgar, just like the forums.

We did ban a poster one time for making threats of physical harm and racial overtones to another poster. Naturally we rely on the integrity of the posters not to do that. If it happens there's no way we can know about it without it being reported.

I'm not crazy about the use of ****, or *** and I do and will ask posters not to use them.
Click to expand...

In other words RT_M
 
Hostile

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Nors said:
What did I deny - other than the fleeting 6-8 270 hype on Kiwi I've been very consistent that he was/is not strong enough and is not a 3-4 DE.

Whatever. I guess the "****" stuff he slings flies in this thread........ Gotcha - guess thats just fine - who needs rules.

Yes - back to thread topic - Kiwi dropping fast on my board!
Click to expand...
You denied your opinion on the subject had ever changed. He provided a link that showed it had. You responded by denying this.

It's there in black and white. You said it. Rather than saying you had changed your opinion and showing your evidence you choose to say that your evidence is proof and his isn't. It doesn't work that way.

In the past you've held several people to one opinion and one only on a subject. It is how you define that poster.

Here, in this case, you got called on the carpet for the exact same practice and it is excusable in your mind.

That's hypocritical. You hold others to a standard you won't adhere to yourself.

A man would accept the facts. A worm will try and wriggle out of them. From there it is your call on how you want to be defined.

In a thread with some very good football analysis it seems a shame to erase that in a vain effort to stand on a pedastal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top