Zaxor
Virtus Mille Scuta
- Messages
- 8,406
- Reaction score
- 38
Let ole Zaxor try and put some perspective into this...
Can anyone (without looking it up) name me the backup for Indy
no
how about Cleveland
no
hmmm
how about the Texans
what I am getting at is this... most to all backup QB's are not
1) very good
2) not worth arguing about
3) if the starter goes down so will the wins
now having said that
lets take our 1 canidate... Romo
thats right folks... Romo was brought in to be a backup..I don't think for one minute that anybody at the ranch is seriously thinking Romo as a franchise type QB... Romo should be able to by this point in his career be a semi competent backup...there should be no arguement from anybody on that...
now we have 1 Starter and 1 Backup now we need a developmental type for franchise QB that folks would be Henson like it or not...
So I am not sure what all the arguement is about they are vying for totally different positions and Henson is competing with himself and next years or the year after that college draft...
I think some are so desperate for a QB (me too) that they are about ready to stick anybody there and give it a go...but lets be reasonable
Bledsoe Starter (good or bad does not matter now)
Romo Backup (should be by now fairly competent)
Henson for the possible future (he has this whole year still to develop)
--------------
now comes the hard part
who do you play when the game either allows you to or the team is out of it
I would always play my future prospect which in this case would be Henson because (see the 3 reasons above) it would be prudent and allow me to evaluate progress and make corrections that needed to be made
Can anyone (without looking it up) name me the backup for Indy
no
how about Cleveland
no
hmmm
how about the Texans
what I am getting at is this... most to all backup QB's are not
1) very good
2) not worth arguing about
3) if the starter goes down so will the wins
now having said that
lets take our 1 canidate... Romo
thats right folks... Romo was brought in to be a backup..I don't think for one minute that anybody at the ranch is seriously thinking Romo as a franchise type QB... Romo should be able to by this point in his career be a semi competent backup...there should be no arguement from anybody on that...
now we have 1 Starter and 1 Backup now we need a developmental type for franchise QB that folks would be Henson like it or not...
So I am not sure what all the arguement is about they are vying for totally different positions and Henson is competing with himself and next years or the year after that college draft...
I think some are so desperate for a QB (me too) that they are about ready to stick anybody there and give it a go...but lets be reasonable
Bledsoe Starter (good or bad does not matter now)
Romo Backup (should be by now fairly competent)
Henson for the possible future (he has this whole year still to develop)
--------------
now comes the hard part
who do you play when the game either allows you to or the team is out of it
I would always play my future prospect which in this case would be Henson because (see the 3 reasons above) it would be prudent and allow me to evaluate progress and make corrections that needed to be made