Not liking Day3 so far

[CATCH17]

The 4th and 5th round should still be rounds where you’re picking upside with starter potential and neither one of these guys are that.

Both of these guys may end up being solid role players but I’m not taking a guy that has no chance of being a starter in the 4th and 5th rounds.

Save that for the tail end and udfa.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

Schultz doesn’t have starter potential? He has the potential to be our starter this year.

 

[texbumthelife]

The 4th and 5th round should still be rounds where you’re picking upside with starter potential and neither one of these guys are that.

Both of these guys may end up being solid role players but I’m not taking a guy that has no chance of being a starter in the 4th and 5th rounds.

Save that for the tail end and udfa.

Dalton Schultz is a starter day one.

 

[Dylan88Wilson]

I was hoping for Hurst & Griffin.

 

[robjay04]

The 4th and 5th round should still be rounds where you’re picking upside with starter potential and neither one of these guys are that.

Both of these guys may end up being solid role players but I’m not taking a guy that has no chance of being a starter in the 4th and 5th rounds.

Save that for the tail end and udfa.

What makes you think neither has starter potential?

I’m not saying that I study all of these players as much as the rest of this board does(sarcasm) but from the scouting reports...it seems like both of these guys are high upside guys with the ability to improve immensely on the next level.

Maybe we view the draft differently. If you’re looking for starters past the 3rd round, I think you’re probably wishing for too much. I think you should look for traits that you can develop and both of the picks today seem to have traits that you can build upon on the next level.

 

[Jake]

The 4th and 5th round should still be rounds where you’re picking upside with starter potential and neither one of these guys are that.

No disrespect to your expertise intended, but according to NFL.com (and others) Armstrong and Schultz do have starter potential.

I'm not going to write them off before the ink has dried on their selection cards.

 

[Kaiser]

Schultz doesn’t have starter potential? He has the potential to be our starter this year.

I don't know that it will be this year and I really thought they would go with different positions (RB, WLB) in the 4th but both these guys have potential. Two years ago we took Anthony Brown and Kavon Frazier in the 6th, neither guy may end up a starter but they were excellent value at those spots.

 

[CATCH17]

Schultz doesn’t have starter potential? He has the potential to be our starter this year.

By default sure... Schultz may start because the TE room is lacking.

He’ll be replaced the first chance Dallas gets.

 

[CWR]

Welcome to every Cowboys draft ever. Their board and that of the media/fans always looks alot different.

Fortunately this has shown me how often times the draft mags dont have a clue. Unfortunately it backfires as well. Difference these days is McClay.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

By default sure... Schultz may start because the TE room is lacking.

He’ll be replaced the first chance Dallas gets.

We’ll see. I think Schultz has a ton of upside.

 

[Bleu Star]

The 4th and 5th round should still be rounds where you’re picking upside with starter potential and neither one of these guys are that.

Both of these guys may end up being solid role players but I’m not taking a guy that has no chance of being a starter in the 4th and 5th rounds.

Save that for the tail end and udfa.

Cmon man. Cheer up. The glass is half full.

 

[CATCH17]

What makes you think neither has starter potential?

I’m not saying that I study all of these players as much as the rest of this board does(sarcasm) but from the scouting reports...it seems like both of these guys are high upside guys with the ability to improve immensely on the next level.

Maybe we view the draft differently. If you’re looking for starters past the 3rd round, I think you’re probably wishing for too much. I think you should look for traits that you can develop and both of the picks today seem to have traits that you can build upon on the next level.

Armstrong is too small for 3 downs.

Schultz is just a guy. No special traits. Complete jag.

 

[Eddie]

I think the Cowboys brass should pay you guys to draft for them.

 

[CATCH17]

Cmon man. Cheer up. The glass is half full.

No I’m cool. I love the first 2 days.

I’m just not a fan of limited players early on day 3.

 

[RS12]

Any pick after the 3rd round is around 50/50 to make the roster. Probably about 25% to make a meaningful contribution.

 

[CPanther95]

We’ll see. I think Schultz has a ton of upside.

Generally speaking, someone with "tons of upside" or who's "ceiling is through the roof" - sucks.

 

[RS12]

By default sure... Schultz may start because the TE room is lacking.

He’ll be replaced the first chance Dallas gets.

Not if he ends up being their best run blocking TE. Getting harder to find and this offense depends on those.

 

[bayeslife]

Catch you can’t possibly know that about these players. Rounds 4-7 are essentially a crapshoot and comes down to who they like on their board.

 

[CATCH17]

Any pick after the 3rd round is around 50/50 to make the roster. Probably about 25% to make a meaningful contribution.

I don’t like this line of thinking but it’s probably statistically true but it’s because you’re picking guys like Armstrong and Schultz who are just limited players.

I’d rather swing for the fence with these picks then swing for the base hit.

 

[TheRomoSexual]

Generally speaking, someone with "tons of upside" or who's "ceiling is through the roof" - sucks.

Generally speak, I have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m saying he will likely contribute day one and has upside.