Notice that we played the 4-3 almost the whole game?

[MichaelWinicki]

Or some variation of a 4-man line...

I know I did!

Great move. We're far better as a 4-3 team.

 

[blindzebra]

We were in 4-3 and 4-2-5 for all but one drive, the one they scored we came out in a 3-4.

Imagine that.

 

[lwehlers]

probaly the reason why is because of dat was not playing today.

 

[kingwhicker]

Well, because it's the greatest defense that man has ever devised. Unfortunately we have a guy obsessed with the that wants to change the best scheme for us.

 

[The30YardSlant]

Actually, we had 3 linemen, 3 LBs and Ware was lined up outside as a rusher. So technically, we still were using 4 LBs even though one was in a stance.

 

[MichaelWinicki]

probaly the reason why is because of dat was not playing today.

Dunno.

I hope that's not the answer because that means our 3-4 is even more fragile than anyone could have imagined.

I'm hoping that we've finally wised up and decided to go with four defensive lineman when teams go with 3 wides in the game.

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Actually, we had 3 linemen, 3 LBs and Ware was lined up outside as a rusher. So technically, we still were using 4 LBs even though one was in a stance.

To me Ware is a DE, not a OLB. And any guy that goes into a 3pt stance is a DE.

 

[Sarge]

Actually, we had 3 linemen, 3 LBs and Ware was lined up outside as a rusher. So technically, we still were using 4 LBs even though one was in a stance.

Wouldn't thst be a 4-3?

 

[blindzebra]

Actually, we had 3 linemen, 3 LBs and Ware was lined up outside as a rusher. So technically, we still were using 4 LBs even though one was in a stance.

Not when that line was Ellis, Ferguson, Glover and Ware.

That was a 4-3 with Ware at RDE.

The only time we were in a true 3-4 they drove for their FG.

 

[MichaelWinicki]

It wouldn't break my heart to see the 3-4 go in the dumpster. Any defense that can hold Philly to 120 yards is the defense we should stick with IMHO.

 

[The30YardSlant]

Wouldn't thst be a 4-3?

Yes, but we were still using 4 LBs. Ware is NOT an NFL DE.

I dont really care what we run, just stating the facts.

 

[Nors]

Miki -

Bledsoe - is this the same guy you Bill fans said sucked? I know 2002 was blacked out by some but Geez- A TAD WRONG THERE!

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Wouldn't thst be a 4-3?

Yeah it is but we have someone that is trying to play games with us.

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

Miki -

Bledsoe - is this the same guy you Bill fans said sucked? I know 2002 was blacked out by some but Geez- A TAD WRONG THERE!

Can we keep this thread on topic...you know...one of your favorite topics. :laugh1:

 

[TruBlueCowboy]

Cowboys were stupid to go to the 3-4 this year. We HAVE the line now for the 4-3. Ware, Ellis and Canty at ends. Glover and Fergy stuffing up the middle. This defense can kick some bleep if Parcells would just stick with its strength on the front seven, which are the linemen, not those linebackers.

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Miki -

Bledsoe - is this the same guy you Bill fans said sucked? I know 2002 was blacked out by some but Geez- A TAD WRONG THERE!

First off I think the season is going to last a little longer there Nors...

Secondly, nice seeing your 3-4 get used so much aye?

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Yes, but we were still using 4 LBs. Ware is NOT an NFL DE.

I dont really care what we run, just stating the facts.

Who says he isn't.

He's bigger than Dwight Feeney.

 

[Nors]

Its all 3-4 - And VARIATIONS OFF THAT! BP described that all TC. The chicken littles are in retreat mode.

Go Defense - we rocked McSoups world! Bledsoe and offense kicked major ***! And that was a 4-3 we shredded!

 

[Sarge]

Yeah it is but we have someone that is trying to play games with us.

.................

 

[TruBlueCowboy]

Yes, but we were still using 4 LBs. Ware is NOT an NFL DE.

I dont really care what we run, just stating the facts.

He's a DE in the same mold as KGB and maybe could be a Haley who bulks up and slowly progresses to a lineman. Cowboys are forcing too much with all those linebackers. Play to your strength.