Ashwynn
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,777
- Reaction score
- 500
So Adam is Chuck Norris. It all makes sense now.trickblue said:and AdamJT13...
So Adam is Chuck Norris. It all makes sense now.trickblue said:and AdamJT13...
DrunkWithPower said:AdamJT13-
If I understand correctly, the skins are in bad shape if the CBA is not extended. I know in previous posts you stated they would probably not have to release any big name players, but what happens if none of the "big name" players want to help the front office out? I just read an article implying Brunell doesn't want to cooperate, so there is some legitimacy to this argument. If they cut them they'll get hit with high cap charges, and keeping them with the charge they have is not possible. I see some really bad things happening if the players just so "take a hike". Am I correct?
WoodysGirl said:Please keep all general cap-related questions or comments to this thread. Thanks.
DrunkWithPower said:I just read in another thread Brunell has agreed to a restructered contract. The good news is he was the least of their problems cap-wise. The bad news is the Commanders got one of their players to cave. Unfortunately for Brunell, I think he could have gotten some money on the FA market since he played very well last year. He chose the safe way and stayed put.
dr_hefley said:So if there's no cap, why do the Commanders have to cut players to "get under the cap?"
I have no idea what the Chuck Norris stuff is about, or how John Clayton figures in this converstion.
dr_hefley said:So if there's no cap, why do the Commanders have to cut players to "get under the cap?"
I have no idea what the Chuck Norris stuff is about, or how John Clayton figures in this converstion.
:beer1::flipflop: yes indeed, maybe one of thiers will fit nicely with crayton and T.O.mmurray21 said:When do the Raiders start cutting guys, they have some nice young receivers that look tasty.
I may be wrong, but I am pretty sure that I remember reading that if no CBA is reached before the start of FA this year, 2007 will STILL be uncapped. Hopefully someone can confirm that or correct me if I am wrong.ravidubey said:So suppose someone cuts a player in June cough-RIVERA-cough expecting to be saved by the uncapped year and then a new CBA happens after the fact? Ooops. Sounds like June cuts should be made with the expecations that a new CBA will be put in effect just in case.
ravidubey said:New question, how do June cuts work this year should 2007 remain uncapped?
eman721 said:I may be wrong, but I am pretty sure that I remember reading that if no CBA is reached before the start of FA this year, 2007 will STILL be uncapped. Hopefully someone can confirm that or correct me if I am wrong.