Creeper
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,951
- Reaction score
- 25,835
And Farscape.Like Firefly.
And Farscape.Like Firefly.
Same opinion. Decided it wasn't worth my time after a couple of episodes.Scarpetta
Prime
3/10
Dont waste your time
Good cast but just bad writing and direction. 80% of the show is not about the actual case but the relationships and those seemed made up and way way exaggerated for no reason. Even the wifey cried uncle after a few episodes
Scarpetta
Prime
3/10
Dont waste your time
Good cast but just bad writing and direction. 80% of the show is not about the actual case but the relationships and those seemed made up and way way exaggerated for no reason. Even the wifey cried uncle after a few episodes
I read some of the books years ago. There was some of the family drama in them but I do not remember it being more of the focal point. Which is a shame because the books were actually pretty good. I thought the first season of the series would touch on the Body Farm in Virginia but it was never mentioned. If you know you know.Same opinion. Decided it wasn't worth my time after a couple of episodes.
Yeah, that’s exactly why they canceled Ted after 2 seasons on Peacock. For me, it was a hilarious show, but they cited expense (mainly the CGI costs) as the reason they couldn’t continue moving forward.Just about every show that has been cancelled after 2+ seasons over the last 10-15 years has the production company behind it saying, "Production costs were too high" followed by "viewership was declining".
Those seemed like legitimate reasons early on but I have read that excuse dozens of times in the last few years when checking if TV shows were cancelled, yet they keep making new shows and cancelling them for the exact same reasons.
If that were truly the reason they would eventually at least add some low-cost productions, but they rarely do that. If the set/location costs are lower, they offset it by bringing in higher paying actors, so it's not really a problem for them.
The truth is the networks have figured out something the NFL figured out long ago .. it's cheaper to drop the shows with actors seeking their 3rd+ season contracts and replace them with new shows with actors on their 1st-2nd year contracts.
While only one season may be guaranteed with a show, the framework for most primary actors in their contracts is defined for the first two seasons of the show.
Basically its "if show is renewed, this is what you will be paid in season 2" agreements so that's why even bad shows sometimes get a second season because it can be cheaper to film scenes/episodes of the second season (especially those with changing locations) ahead of time and the production company already knows how much the actors will cost.
So the production companies will blame costs but in reality it's not that shows are cost-prohibitive but simply profit margins are directly impacted making newer shows more profitable.
The exceptions of course are the shows with a high probability of syndication, especially if they can hit that 100+ episode magic number.
Hence the explosion of reality shows that started up about a decade ago. Cheaper to pay non actor wages to a bunch of people desperate to get on tv each year.Just about every show that has been cancelled after 2+ seasons over the last 10-15 years has the production company behind it saying, "Production costs were too high" followed by "viewership was declining".
Those seemed like legitimate reasons early on but I have read that excuse dozens of times in the last few years when checking if TV shows were cancelled, yet they keep making new shows and cancelling them for the exact same reasons.
If that were truly the reason they would eventually at least add some low-cost productions, but they rarely do that. If the set/location costs are lower, they offset it by bringing in higher paying actors, so it's not really a problem for them.
The truth is the networks have figured out something the NFL figured out long ago .. it's cheaper to drop the shows with actors seeking their 3rd+ season contracts and replace them with new shows with actors on their 1st-2nd year contracts.
While only one season may be guaranteed with a show, the framework for most primary actors in their contracts is defined for the first two seasons of the show.
Basically its "if show is renewed, this is what you will be paid in season 2" agreements so that's why even bad shows sometimes get a second season because it can be cheaper to film scenes/episodes of the second season (especially those with changing locations) ahead of time and the production company already knows how much the actors will cost.
So the production companies will blame costs but in reality it's not that shows are cost-prohibitive but simply profit margins are directly impacted making newer shows more profitable.
The exceptions of course are the shows with a high probability of syndication, especially if they can hit that 100+ episode magic number.
Both Bob Newhart shows.Cheers for me.
Also, Bob Newhart
Sliders wasn't about time travel, but it came to mind for me as well. Kari Wuhrer used to come to mind a lot back then!I loved Sliders. Seems close. I will it check out. Not sure where these other replies mean.
Agreed. Was stuck in the hospital/rehab nursing home for close to six months. The cable tv selections were very basic. One channel played a lot of old tv classics. The only one i looked forward two was a two episode block of Mash in the morning. I think that was on MeTvI can watch MASH over and over. Love the comedy and storylines in some of the episodes
The Duffer brothers new project (stranger things)
This might be stranger things but in some kind of retirement community out in the desert.
Going to give it a whirl.
