OG- Free

8. Not surprisingly, the Doug-Free-at-right-guard experiment was a flop. Free had never played a single snap at guard in the NFL … or college … or high school. Suddenly – because of injuries to Ron Leary and Nate Livings and the ensuing shuffling of linemen - he’s lined up against Geno Atkins, one of the best defensive tackles in the NFL. On the Cowboys’ first snap Free miscommunicated with right tackle Jeremy Parnell, leading to a sack of Tony Romo. By my count, Free had a false start penalty and allowed two sacks. I’ve seen enough.
Was it really a miscommunication? Parnell and Free were each blocking a defender when a blitzing defender came through the gap. Would better communication allow 2 OLinemen to block 3 players?

That play was either the fault of a RB or TE in the backfield and/or Romo not being aware. Both the RB and a TE were on the left side of Romo and would have picked up a blitz on that side. Either one of them (RB or TE) played it incorrectly or Romo should have know that the right side was vulnerable to a blitz. The RTs man was rushing outside and the RGs man was rushing to his inside. It was not possible for them to also block the blitzing defender.
 
I guess the 2 sacks he's referring to are the ones to start the game and the one a little over halfway through the 2nd quarter.

The first one is kind of hard for me to pin on Free to any great extent, if even at all.

The Bengals brought 5 rushers and they had Michael Johnson give the impression of a rush before chucking Witten at the line and dropping off into the flat. Johnson had the attention of Tyron which basically left 5 rushers to be accounted for by the 4 linemen. Free and Frederick both picked up their DL right off the snap. They're actually the only two guys who are still holding their blocks when Romo goes down. Parnell was losing his battle but Mack was just awful and was beaten right off the snap. Literally didn't do a thing to even slow his guy down. His man was about 1/2 of a step behind the unblocked blitzing linebacker. You basically have the DE and DT and two linebackers blitzing from the right. Dallas only had Frederick, Free and Parnell on the line to account for those 4 guys. What's Free supposed to do? Not block Atkins so he can pick up the LB who's coming in? What is Parnell supposed to do? Ignore the outside blitzer to pick up the guy coming right between himself and Free?

IMO, the problem on the first sack wasn't primarily what was going on up front. That blitzer wasn't identified presnap and quite frankly there's no way I say Free should be responsible for that. He was driven back but he had his man locked up and appeared to be giving enough room for Romo to navigate through and step up if the rush hadn't gotten their first. Parnell too was in a tough spot as the guy he picked up blitzed from his position lined up on the slot receiver. He didn't do that well and would have been beaten had the play progressed but he can't block both blitzers on his own and there was room for Romo to step up if he sees that guy coming. The combo of Free getting pushed in and Parnell jumping out to take that outside rusher opened a lane almost as wide as the hashmarks. It was well drawn up and executed even better. It wasn't recognized presnap and part of that falls on someone out there but a lot of that is just good play by the Bengals.

Ultimately it wouldn't have mattered even if they had picked it up because Bernadeau did an absolutely horrible job. He comes out of his stance, shuffles back a bit and then tries to play catch up as the DT runs right around him. I'm not sure he did anything to slow him down. It was horrendous. I hope Broaddus "outstanding" claim isn't considering this play and the rest of the game he was outstanding because if there are many more plays like this, I would disagree outright. This play was so awful it's almost hard to imagine that Mack would be outstanding at any point in the game. It's on par with the half-hearted shoulder thrust he tried in the Bucs game last year that resulted in Romo being slaughtered.

The problem with this play was that the Bengals had flawless execution and Dallas didn't see the blitz. The most glaring eyesore is clearly Bernadette's inability to do anything that would slow down his man. Free and Frederick did well enough and while Parnell was beaten, it was nowhere near as bad as Bernadeau given the assignment he had.

The second sack I would split between Free and Parnell. Parnell was beaten around the edge by Johnson, forcing Romo to step up into the guy who had beaten Free to the inside. As soon as Romo completes his drop he has to head back upfield. He never had time to set up a throw and was flushed right into the guy that Free was struggling with. They both get a little bit of this one, IMO.
 
Was it really a miscommunication? Parnell and Free were each blocking a defender when a blitzing defender came through the gap. Would better communication allow 2 OLinemen to block 3 players?

That play was either the fault of a RB or TE in the backfield and/or Romo not being aware. Both the RB and a TE were on the left side of Romo and would have picked up a blitz on that side. Either one of them (RB or TE) played it incorrectly or Romo should have know that the right side was vulnerable to a blitz. The RTs man was rushing outside and the RGs man was rushing to his inside. It was not possible for them to also block the blitzing defender.

That's where I'm at on this issue. I would say Murray is most likely responsible for the mental lapse in not picking up that blitzer but I'm really not sure it was identified, presnap. I point to Murray because I believe it would be near impossible for Hannah to even see that blitzer from where he was at. I'm not sure there's any way that he gets there even if he does see it.

I think you either need Murray's initial step to be to his right instead of his left, or you need Hannah to be lined up on the opposite side of the formation.

I agree with you that it was a miss before the snap. You aren't going to talk your way through blocking 3 guys when you only commit 2 blockers.
 
I guess the 2 sacks he's referring to are the ones to start the game and the one a little over halfway through the 2nd quarter.

The first one is kind of hard for me to pin on Free to any great extent, if even at all.

The Bengals brought 5 rushers and they had Michael Johnson give the impression of a rush before chucking Witten at the line and dropping off into the flat. Johnson had the attention of Tyron which basically left 5 rushers to be accounted for by the 4 linemen. Free and Frederick both picked up their DL right off the snap. They're actually the only two guys who are still holding their blocks when Romo goes down. Parnell was losing his battle but Mack was just awful and was beaten right off the snap. Literally didn't do a thing to even slow his guy down. His man was about 1/2 of a step behind the unblocked blitzing linebacker. You basically have the DE and DT and two linebackers blitzing from the right. Dallas only had Frederick, Free and Parnell on the line to account for those 4 guys. What's Free supposed to do? Not block Atkins so he can pick up the LB who's coming in? What is Parnell supposed to do? Ignore the outside blitzer to pick up the guy coming right between himself and Free?

IMO, the problem on the first sack wasn't primarily what was going on up front. That blitzer wasn't identified presnap and quite frankly there's no way I say Free should be responsible for that. He was driven back but he had his man locked up and appeared to be giving enough room for Romo to navigate through and step up if the rush hadn't gotten their first. Parnell too was in a tough spot as the guy he picked up blitzed from his position lined up on the slot receiver. He didn't do that well and would have been beaten had the play progressed but he can't block both blitzers on his own and there was room for Romo to step up if he sees that guy coming. The combo of Free getting pushed in and Parnell jumping out to take that outside rusher opened a lane almost as wide as the hashmarks. It was well drawn up and executed even better. It wasn't recognized presnap and part of that falls on someone out there but a lot of that is just good play by the Bengals.

Ultimately it wouldn't have mattered even if they had picked it up because Bernadeau did an absolutely horrible job. He comes out of his stance, shuffles back a bit and then tries to play catch up as the DT runs right around him. I'm not sure he did anything to slow him down. It was horrendous. I hope Broaddus "outstanding" claim isn't considering this play and the rest of the game he was outstanding because if there are many more plays like this, I would disagree outright. This play was so awful it's almost hard to imagine that Mack would be outstanding at any point in the game. It's on par with the half-hearted shoulder thrust he tried in the Bucs game last year that resulted in Romo being slaughtered.

The problem with this play was that the Bengals had flawless execution and Dallas didn't see the blitz. The most glaring eyesore is clearly Bernadette's inability to do anything that would slow down his man. Free and Frederick did well enough and while Parnell was beaten, it was nowhere near as bad as Bernadeau given the assignment he had.

The second sack I would split between Free and Parnell. Parnell was beaten around the edge by Johnson, forcing Romo to step up into the guy who had beaten Free to the inside. As soon as Romo completes his drop he has to head back upfield. He never had time to set up a throw and was flushed right into the guy that Free was struggling with. They both get a little bit of this one, IMO.

I agree it's hard to assign blame to either player on that play. It was either a misidentification by the protection call or the back and/or TE messed up.

As for Bern and Parnell's blocks, what you need to do is imagine where the pocket was supposed to be on that play (ideally about a yard or 2 in front of where Romo went down). Obviously, the blitzing LB screwed up the whole play and pocket but where Romo was supposed to be setting up, if there was no LB blitzing, the Parnell and Bern both would have pushed their men past the pocket and Free's man would be the only person causing serious pressure on that play. I believe Free played well but that was a hiccup.
 
I hope Broaddus "outstanding" claim isn't considering this play and the rest of the game he was outstanding because if there are many more plays like this, I would disagree outright. This play was so awful it's almost hard to imagine that Mack would be outstanding at any point in the game. It's on par with the half-hearted shoulder thrust he tried in the Bucs game last year that resulted in Romo being slaughtered.

Broaddus does not objectively report. He sees himself as a scout. Of course, if he was a good scout, he would be scouting somewhere. He decides whether he likes a player and does his best to sell everyone else on his view. I always read his reports, but I don't put any stock into his player evaluations.
 
I agree it's hard to assign blame to either player on that play. It was either a misidentification by the protection call or the back and/or TE messed up.

As for Bern and Parnell's blocks, what you need to do is imagine where the pocket was supposed to be on that play (ideally about a yard or 2 in front of where Romo went down). Obviously, the blitzing LB screwed up the whole play and pocket but where Romo was supposed to be setting up, if there was no LB blitzing, the Parnell and Bern both would have pushed their men past the pocket and Free's man would be the only person causing serious pressure on that play. I believe Free played well but that was a hiccup.

Parnell perhaps, Bernie absolutely not. Those defenders ran to the QB, not to that spot. Bernie wasn't in position at all, was barely touching the guy and his man was at Romo at the same time the blitzer was. Saying that the defender would have been beyond Romo in the pocket some 2 yards upfield hinges on the assumption that Romo had time to even start to step up in the pocket, something he did not. He completed his drop and then just jumped to the ground.

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y188/thehoofbite/ScreenShot2013-08-25at40105PM.jpg

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y188/thehoofbite/ScreenShot2013-08-25at40117PM.jpg

The blitzer is what caused the play to end but that's only because Romo saw it coming. Mack's man was every bit as close and closing in on Romo but Romo likely was unaware that Mack had given his guy a free run as well.

In hindsight it's probably good that the free blizter was coming. Otherwise, Romo is just teed up for a blind sided hit.

Parnell had his man wide enough. If the blitzer isn't there, Romo would have had the room to step up even with Free right there in the middle. He likely would have had to work around him but that's not a big deal. Romo works around a lot of slop all the time. So long as Free maintains the block, the play proceeds.

The only problem is that Mack didn't do anything and even without the blitzer coming, that play doesn't go anywhere and Romo takes a massive hit.
 
Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus2h
@doyle_pj: @BryanBroaddus I thought Free did pretty ok@guard last night. Better than Arkin?” He is a better tackle. Leary needs to return.

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus3h
@LiLStone87 Free needs to play tackle and Leary needs to play guard and they will have their best five.

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus4h
@KennyEller4: After last night's performance, do you think Bernadeau stays at left guard?” He had moments where he wasn't great too.


Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus4h
@coopmavs: @BryanBroaddus Think Free is a disaster at RG.” Played a little upright but had some nice backside cutoffs with 2nd level reach
 
Regardless of which player was at fault, Jerry's and Red's statements are very telling IMO. I think we are seeing the transition to Bernie being their ultimate interior back-up (Red saying Bernie was a project signing that can play all 3 spots) with Free and Leary starting at G. Jerry saying this would have happened earlier had Parnell been healthy (which is bull because they could have done this FREE/Parnell G/T experiment during AZs practice week to give Free a look), says more about their distaste for Bernie as a starter than anything to me.
 
Smith-Leary-Fredrick-Free-Parnell looks like an offensive line that is about average (compared to the rest of the NFL) but with a ton of upside because everyone of those guys will get better week after week due to youth or inexperience at their current position. Right now I think it's about a top 15-18 o-line in the league but potentially could be a top 10 if they make progress individually and as a unit.

Free did a nice job and so did Parnell
 
Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus2h
@doyle_pj: @BryanBroaddus I thought Free did pretty ok@guard last night. Better than Arkin?” He is a better tackle. Leary needs to return.

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus3h
@LiLStone87 Free needs to play tackle and Leary needs to play guard and they will have their best five.

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus4h
@KennyEller4: After last night's performance, do you think Bernadeau stays at left guard?” He had moments where he wasn't great too.


Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus4h
@coopmavs: @BryanBroaddus Think Free is a disaster at RG.” Played a little upright but had some nice backside cutoffs with 2nd level reach

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus2h
@doyle_pj: @BryanBroaddus I thought Free did pretty ok@guard last night. Better than Arkin?” He is a better tackle. Leary needs to return.

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus3h
@LiLStone87 Free needs to play tackle and Leary needs to play guard and they will have their best five.

Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus4h
@KennyEller4: After last night's performance, do you think Bernadeau stays at left guard?” He had moments where he wasn't great too.


Bryan Broaddus ‏@BryanBroaddus4h
@coopmavs: @BryanBroaddus Think Free is a disaster at RG.” Played a little upright but had some nice backside cutoffs with 2nd level reach

Of course that's what BB would say. He wants his pet cat to be on the field. Mack was the weak link on the line yesterday and that was obvious to the naked eye.
 
Of course that's what BB would say. He wants his pet cat to be on the field. Mack was the weak link on the line yesterday and that was obvious to the naked eye.

I disagree with BB here. Leary does need to return but its to get Berny off the field... I like Free at RG and Parnell at RT, then add Leary as the LG and Berny as a reserve... thats just my opinion.

The question is who is better Berny at RG or Parnell at RT? i think its the latter because of Parnell's upside along with the fact Free will improve too the more he plays RG.... Berny is what he is, I don't see him having any upside or improving too much from the player he already is, which in my eyes makes him a backup
 
I didn't see that at all. He actually anchored very well and there were times he stood his man straight up. He was also good at sealing off his man and getting to the 2nd level to block. Free also did a solid job working well with Fred and Parnell. Lets be honest this guy has had 3 practices here and after 3 practices he looked solid.
Yea, there are times he does that, because, overall, he's a pretty good athlete.

The problem I have is on those plays, and I think it was the one where Romo got sacked trying to step up in the pocket, where he gets tossed aside like a ragdoll. Imagine him going against the likes of Geno Atkins every single play. I dont like his odds once they realize they can bull rush him.
 
Yea, there are times he does that, because, overall, he's a pretty good athlete.

The problem I have is on those plays, and I think it was the one where Romo got sacked trying to step up in the pocket, where he gets tossed aside like a ragdoll. Imagine him going against the likes of Geno Atkins every single play. I dont like his odds once they realize they can bull rush him.

I know the play you are thinking of and Parnell got beat and Free did give up some push on that play and Romo stepped up to his left and gave up. But I think if Parnell doesn't get beat the little bit of ground that Free gave up wouldn't have been an issue also if I remember it was also only a 3 man route?
 
It never ceases to amaze me how much fans of this team love to hate this team. Is there another fanbase in the NFL that does this like Dallas?

I was pretty pleased with Free - overall I'm cautiously optimistic about our OL this season.

yes. all of them
 
I know the play you are thinking of and Parnell got beat and Free did give up some push on that play and Romo stepped up to his left and gave up. But I think if Parnell doesn't get beat the little bit of ground that Free gave up wouldn't have been an issue also if I remember it was also only a 3 man route?
Sounds like we are talking about the same play...but the point is, I think his weakness has always been the fact that he can get pushed around by bull rushers, which causes him to be a step behind for speed rushers, causing him to get off balance all the time. Now getting his fundamentals and technique improved will help, but it seems to me like the inability to keep from getting pushed would be a bigger problem at guard.
 
Sounds like we are talking about the same play...but the point is, I think his weakness has always been the fact that he can get pushed around by bull rushers, which causes him to be a step behind for speed rushers, causing him to get off balance all the time. Now getting his fundamentals and technique improved will help, but it seems to me like the inability to keep from getting pushed would be a bigger problem at guard.

While I agree with you I also think that because he is athletic it might help him at OG. One thing I noticed and it was very small is he never seemed to go flat footed which would get him into trouble he seemed to keep his feet moving which I noticed gave him the ability to recover. Now that's not to say he won't have his problems because every linemen in the league isn't perfect but what I was encouraged with is it only being 3 practices and he looked pretty good and comfortable there.
 
Parnell perhaps, Bernie absolutely not. Those defenders ran to the QB, not to that spot. Bernie wasn't in position at all, was barely touching the guy and his man was at Romo at the same time the blitzer was. Saying that the defender would have been beyond Romo in the pocket some 2 yards upfield hinges on the assumption that Romo had time to even start to step up in the pocket, something he did not. He completed his drop and then just jumped to the ground.

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y188/thehoofbite/ScreenShot2013-08-25at40105PM.jpg

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y188/thehoofbite/ScreenShot2013-08-25at40117PM.jpg

The blitzer is what caused the play to end but that's only because Romo saw it coming. Mack's man was every bit as close and closing in on Romo but Romo likely was unaware that Mack had given his guy a free run as well.

In hindsight it's probably good that the free blizter was coming. Otherwise, Romo is just teed up for a blind sided hit.

Parnell had his man wide enough. If the blitzer isn't there, Romo would have had the room to step up even with Free right there in the middle. He likely would have had to work around him but that's not a big deal. Romo works around a lot of slop all the time. So long as Free maintains the block, the play proceeds.

The only problem is that Mack didn't do anything and even without the blitzer coming, that play doesn't go anywhere and Romo takes a massive hit.

Romo didn't even think about stepping up because the LB had a dead beat on him. End of play!

The linemen don't know where the QB is just where he's supposed to be. The reason Bern was not in position to block was because his man took an unnatural angle bee lining for the QB. It happens to guards all the time, they get beat to their outside shoulder and push their man past the QB, just like tackles do. Atkins' rush was so wide on that play that Bern wasn't expecting that at all. And that was because of the drop and Romo being unable to step up.
 
Broaddus does not objectively report. He sees himself as a scout. Of course, if he was a good scout, he would be scouting somewhere. He decides whether he likes a player and does his best to sell everyone else on his view. I always read his reports, but I don't put any stock into his player evaluations.

Nail meet hammer.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,015
Messages
14,506,716
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top