If you want to use last year as an analogy by mentioning the hypothetical of OU beating TX, you would have to add in TX beating BYU.trickblue;2924545 said:Funny thing... if we go by last year...
If OU were to beat UT, now, and they both end with one loss, then UT should play for the National Championship...
Rogah;2924556 said:If you want to use last year as an analogy by mentioning the hypothetical of OU beating TX, you would have to add in TX beating BYU.
Of course, BYU doesn't play TX (nor are they in the same conference) so it is a situation that couldn't happen.
I tell ya this... I sure as heck take the MWC a lot more seriously than I do the "no ranked teams" Big East. Can someone explain to me why the Big East gets an automatic BCS bid every year but any MWC or WAC team that wants to go to the BCS has to go undefeated?Avery;2924555 said:I am telling you, people need to start taking the Mountain West Conference seriously.
And my point is that when you have 3 teams all with the same record, where Team A beat Team B, Team B beat Team C and Team C beat Team A, then it is impossible to go with head to head.trickblue;2924559 said:My point is that head to head is what matters given you end up with the same record...
Rogah;2924568 said:And my point is that when you have 3 teams all with the same record, where Team A beat Team B, Team B beat Team C and Team C beat Team A, then it is impossible to go with head to head.
Irrelevant. You just want head to head to apply in the case where it benefits you and throw it out in the case it doesn't.trickblue;2924608 said:Not when only two are up for the NC...
Bizwah;2924368 said:He took a lick.
Surprised that BYU's defense is actually containing the Sooners