Old Article: Parcells says he supports signing of Owens

TheSport78

The Excellence of Execution
Messages
10,396
Reaction score
3,674
Parcells says he supports signing of Owens (ESPN.com)

Associated Press

IRVING, Texas -- Bill Parcells said Friday he's happy to have Terrell Owens on the Dallas Cowboys, even if it took him 48 days to say so.

"I say, 'I support it,' and that's the way we go," Parcells said. "I don't view it as a gamble. It's in my best interest that he's successful. And it's in his best interest that he's successful. ...

"I'm not approaching this with the idea it's going to be adversarial or I'm going to be mandating every little thing this player does," he added.

Parcells loves keeping a low profile in the offseason, but he took it to an extreme this year, especially with all the scrutiny surrounding the signing of Owens and questions about whether owner Jerry Jones truly made the move with his coach's consent.

Parcells mentioned several times that the decision to sign Owens was made by the team's entire front office, noting that picking players "is about a 50-50 proposition anyway."

"We work as a team here, we really do," he said. "We make decisions as an organization and we do it collectively, now more than ever. Whatever decision we make, we all support that. I support whatever decision we make as an organization. I was part of it, I continue to be part of it.

"Hey, now, I'm not going to say we don't have a difference of opinion on some things. Once we go, we're going. If we're wrong, we'll cut our losses and keep going," he said.

The news conference Friday afternoon, following the first practice of a rookie mini-camp, marked Parcells' first comments to local media since Owens joined the club March 18. Sitting down at the start of the gathering, he smiled at the dozen or so cameras facing him and said, "Well, let me see what you want to talk about here."

The first question was obviously about Owens and the response wasn't exactly seven weeks in the making.

"He's a good, productive player -- has been for a long time," Parcells said. "I've seen quite a bit of him. I think he can help us."

Owens hasn't been taking part in the full offseason conditioning program at team headquarters, but Parcells said, "He's done exactly what I wanted," explaining that he wanted Owens to take care of some other matters first so they wouldn't be in the way later.

"I'm not giving him special leeway," Parcells said.

Parcells said he liked what he heard from several people who know Owens. He especially liked the fact Owens "responds to competition."

"If the answer to that question was no, then I probably would've had a problem with bringing him here," Parcells said. "Everyone I consulted on that -- which was people who know, not guess, know -- were very positive in that regard."

As for all the off-field incidents that have dogged Owens, speeding his departure from San Francisco and Philadelphia, Parcells said: "I think this thing has taken on a life of its own with him. ... I don't really know whether that's true or not. My best guess is it really is a little exaggerated."

Last season, the Cowboys started 7-3 but then faded to finish 9-7. They missed the playoffs for the second straight season and have gone 10 seasons without winning a playoff game.

Parcells signed a contract extension through 2007 before Owens was added.

"It hasn't gone exactly the way I wanted it to go," he said of his first three seasons. "I think we were a lot closer to being really good last year than anyone really knows."


Hmm it seems like Bill was forced to sugar coat the signing of Owens to not start the signing off on a sour note. Now it's easy for T.O. and Parcells to tell how they truly feel..
 

DBoys

New Member
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
0
He said that many times and now after he quites he says the opposite.

Later tuna :cool:
 

Mash

Active Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
0
He didn't come close and is defensive about his accomplishments with the Cowboys. "I didn't lose down there," he said. "We had a winning record. The franchise is a lot better than it was. We had three winning seasons out of four. The problem is the standard is pretty high. I don't feel like I did a bad job there."


What?

Bill...u stated "get your expectations high"......but now the problem is....the standard was too high?

All that money and the fund you created for all your old ex players for retirement that Jerry paid and are standards were too high? a .500 team with no playoff victories...

Funny how things work when your not employed anymore by Jerry....
 

TheSport78

The Excellence of Execution
Messages
10,396
Reaction score
3,674
Mash;1499287 said:
He didn't come close and is defensive about his accomplishments with the Cowboys. "I didn't lose down there," he said. "We had a winning record. The franchise is a lot better than it was. We had three winning seasons out of four. The problem is the standard is pretty high. I don't feel like I did a bad job there."


What?

Bill...u stated "get your expectations high"......but now the problem is....the standard was too high?

All that money and the fund you created for all your old ex players for retirement that Jerry paid and are standards were too high? a .500 team with no playoff victories...

Funny how things work when your not employed anymore by Jerry....

great point Mash
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
I"m sure he said whatever had to be said at any particular time to keep the media hounds at bay and to stamp out any impending controversy before it started. He's the one that had to face the media every time TO has a "reaction" to a bottleful of pain meds. Chan Gailey is about as honest, God fearing a man as you'll find and he had to get up in front of the media and lie through his teeth as to how Everett McIver just happened to wind up with a pair of scissors stuck in his neck by complete accident. When you coach players like Michael Irvin and Terrell Owens, you end up being a full time football coach and a full time publicist.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
43,000
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
People seem to forget that there is a difference between wanting a player here and going with the decision.

Plus it has been said by both bill and jerry multiple times that in case of a tie (one wanting something and the other not) Jerry holds the tie breaker vote.

So it is very possible, and probably true, that bill did not want TO here but once Jerry made the decision he went along with the decision.

I am also sure there were times that Bill convinced Jerry of some things he wanted so I would imagine there were some give and take situations there to make the relationship work.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
BrAinPaiNt;1499305 said:
People seem to forget that there is a difference between wanting a player here and going with the decision.

Plus it has been said by both bill and jerry multiple times that in case of a tie (one wanting something and the other not) Jerry holds the tie breaker vote.

So it is very possible, and probably true, that bill did not want TO here but once Jerry made the decision he went along with the decision.

I am also sure there were times that Bill convinced Jerry of some things he wanted so I would imagine there were some give and take situations there to make the relationship work.

Well said and I agree that's probably how things went. That's probably why the relationship went as well as it did.

Given that Bill will now be a part of the media again, I'm sure we'll have plenty of 'quotables' in the future too.
 

RealCowboyfan

Championship
Messages
4,587
Reaction score
1
Yeah sure tuna... we really believe you.

Tuna didn't even act like he wanted T.O. to be there.

- He wasn't worried about what happen with Owens
- "THE PLAYER"?
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
RealCowboyfan;1499586 said:
Yeah sure tuna... we really believe you.

Tuna didn't even act like he wanted T.O. to be there.

- He wasn't worried about what happen with Owens
- "THE PLAYER"?

Parcells did not want to deal with the 1001 question every single day about TO I don't blame him he is coaching an entire team not just TO. I have no doubt Jerry is the one who approached the subject of signing TO and Parcells went along with it. I don't think Parcells hated TO he hated the constant talk about TO
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
WV Cowboy;1499910 said:
Was he lying then or is he lying now ?
he was lying then. if you guys can't figure out that parcells didn't want t.O. you guys have some issues upstairs
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
WV Cowboy;1499910 said:
Was he lying then or is he lying now ?

What's contradictory about what he said?

He's saying it wasn't his decision, but he supported it. That's been apparent since the moment it happened, hasn't it?
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
43,000
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
AdamJT13;1499920 said:
What's contradictory about what he said?

He's saying it wasn't his decision, but he supported it. That's been apparent since the moment it happened, hasn't it?

Yes I don't get it with people saying he was contradicting himself or lying.

He played the role of company man and as I have said before both Bill and Jerry have said multiple times that Jerry has the final say in all matters.

People just don't want to believe that but it is the truth.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,330
Reaction score
64,031
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
You don't have to like Owens to cheer for the Dallas Cowboys.
You don't have to like Owens to play for the Dallas Cowboys.
You don't have to like Owens to report about the Dallas Cowboys.
And you don't have to like Owens to coach for the Dallas Cowboys.

Parcells is no longer the head coach. Phillips is. True or not, his comments are harmless and they do not effect the team or its future. Owens' ego remains untainted by outside influences. There is no 'conspiracy' surrounding Parcells' comments. What's the big deal? :confused:
 

WV Cowboy

Waitin' on the 6th
Messages
11,604
Reaction score
1,744
AdamJT13;1499920 said:
What's contradictory about what he said?

He's saying it wasn't his decision, but he supported it. That's been apparent since the moment it happened, hasn't it?

From an article in another thread .....

09:25 PM CDT on Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Don't be fooled when it comes to Bill Parcells: He controlled every facet of the Cowboys' organization.

Yes, that includes giving his blessing when Jerry Jones broached the subject of adding Terrell Owens to the roster. Sooner or later, you knew this was going to happen.

You knew Parcells and his band of apologists would start whispering and writing stories that the future Hall of Fame coach had no say in Owens joining the roster.

Poppycock.

The Cowboys didn't add a single player in four years that Parcells didn't want on the roster and during his time here, he certainly wasn't shy about telling anyone about his power when it came to the roster and hiring assistant coaches.

The problem is that Parcells doesn't want to admit he failed in Dallas.

No doubt.

Jones paid him nearly $20 million over four seasons because he wanted a return to the glory days. Around here, that means Super Bowls.

When winning a Super Bowl is the goal, you can't call 34-32, no division titles and no playoff wins a successful era.
It's not.

And when you hire a Super Bowl-caliber coach, anything less than a trip to the Super Bowl at some time during his tenure denotes failure.

Yes the standards are high in Dallas. Tom Landry and Jimmy Johnson made it that way. It's never going to change.
Parcells didn't meet that standard. Revising history isn't going to help him.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Posting editorial pieces in response to a direct interpretation of what was actually said.

That is fresh. :lol:
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,330
Reaction score
64,031
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WV Cowboy;1499968 said:
From an article in another thread .....

09:25 PM CDT on Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Don't be fooled when it comes to Bill Parcells: He controlled every facet of the Cowboys' organization.

Yes, that includes giving his blessing when Jerry Jones broached the subject of adding Terrell Owens to the roster. Sooner or later, you knew this was going to happen.

You knew Parcells and his band of apologists would start whispering and writing stories that the future Hall of Fame coach had no say in Owens joining the roster.

Poppycock.

The Cowboys didn't add a single player in four years that Parcells didn't want on the roster and during his time here, he certainly wasn't shy about telling anyone about his power when it came to the roster and hiring assistant coaches.

The problem is that Parcells doesn't want to admit he failed in Dallas.

No doubt.

Jones paid him nearly $20 million over four seasons because he wanted a return to the glory days. Around here, that means Super Bowls.

When winning a Super Bowl is the goal, you can't call 34-32, no division titles and no playoff wins a successful era.
It's not.

And when you hire a Super Bowl-caliber coach, anything less than a trip to the Super Bowl at some time during his tenure denotes failure.

Yes the standards are high in Dallas. Tom Landry and Jimmy Johnson made it that way. It's never going to change.
Parcells didn't meet that standard. Revising history isn't going to help him.
Even the act of 'giving his blessing' doesn't contradict Parcells' statements.
 

WV Cowboy

Waitin' on the 6th
Messages
11,604
Reaction score
1,744
superpunk;1499972 said:
Posting editorial pieces in response to a direct interpretation of what was actually said.

That is fresh. :lol:

Right, .. that's what you do when you are just sharing info with others and not jamming your own opinion down their throat, .. like some do. ;)
 
Top