On the eve of Free Agency, one last time: Yay or Nay to TO?

JonCJG

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
162
We sign T.O. we have the number One player at WR, and Glenn and Key as possibly the best #2 and #3 combo in the league. Add to that Witten at TE and Crayton as our #4 and we are putting up points with a decent O line.
 

BigWillie

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,400
Reaction score
1,142
I'd rig this vote and select NAY 100k times if I could.

But we'll more likely sign him. If so, I'll become an avid golf fan or something along the lines. I swore I would never root for a team that had TO as a member, because people like him give the game of football a bad name. I still mean it as well.

He's disrespected franchise after franchise and other franchises in the process of feeding his own ego, while not worrying about anyone but himself. It seems almost if he enjoys saying idiotic things or doing idiotic things so his face can be on TV.

I said it when TO signed with the Eagles (along with every Cowboys fan known to man), TO will NEVER grow up and will be nothing more than a distraction. We don't need a presence like him around young players like JJ, Ware, Spears, Canty, etc.,

My vote -- NO as many times as allowed.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
I'll officially go on record as saying: Hell Nay!

I don't want that punk on the Cowboys and I don't think Parcells does either.

Personally, I don't think there's a chance in hell that it happens and that the people who think it might happen will look back and say, "What the heck was I thinking?" I mean, just look at the clues:

* Parcells said he's too old to coach punks.
* One of the Dallas personnel guys rolled his eyes when asked about TO.
* Parcells likes Keyshawn and Loves his attitude and run blocking and it would be hard to imagine Bill benching him.
* Parcells likes Glenn and loves his athleticism and it would be hard to imagine Bill benching him.
* Parcells wants a smashmouth, run-first offense and we need OL way more than we need WR.
* TO is just as old as Glenn and Keyshawn.
* Every problem player that Parcells has ever had was still a good teammate and a team first type of guy... not a self-centered, me-first guy like TO. Antonio Bryant was more like TO and you saw where that got him with Bill.
* TO desecrated the star at Texas Stadium... twice.
* Parcells historically doesn't like to spend big money at the WR position.

Just too many things going against it for it to happen.

If I'm wrong, I'll gladly take my medicine... and around mouthfulls of crow, I'll admit that I was wrong.

Won't happen though.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
justbob said:
no--no--nay--not --no dang way ever


Ditto.


Anyone that actually wants that loser on the team is delusional.
 

neosapien23

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,897
Reaction score
161
Rack said:
Ditto.


Anyone that actually wants that loser on the team is delusional.

Lets see if you still feel that way if TO helps the Cowboys win a superbowl!:rolleyes:
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
neosapien23 said:
Lets see if you still feel that way if TO helps the Cowboys win a superbowl!:rolleyes:

Not gonna happen. Let's see how you feel when TO tears up yet another stupid team from within.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
neosapien23 said:
Lets see if you still feel that way if TO helps the Cowboys win a superbowl!:rolleyes:


:rolleyes:


Let's see what happens when TO gets sand in his **** and decides he doesn't want to reach as low as his kneecap to catch a slant pass. Let's see what happens when he destroys the chemistry of the next team he plays for.
 

cowboyeric8

Chicks dig crutches
Messages
5,563
Reaction score
496
hell nay,

I would rather win without him than with him, as a matter of fact I would rather lose without him than win with him, thats how much I hate him and his ego.
 
Top