Ren;5062485 said:
Which was panic trade and reach?
How could anyone not like that contingency plan
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. The trade was not a panic trade. They had been talking to San Francisco for several weeks about the possibility of trading down, depending on how the draft fell.
If you feel that the trade was not for value, fine argue that they got poor value on the trade. I personally would have preferred a little more value, but I am not going to get into a big fuss over 80 points on the draft value board....
If you don't like a certain player at a certain point, fine that is your prerogative. Everyone has different opinions.
But to say it was a panic trade, is absolutely positively WRONG.