peplaw06
That Guy
- Messages
- 13,699
- Reaction score
- 413
Just fine troll.2233boys said:![]()
I'll do it again if I like. In fact...
How does that grab you...
Just fine troll.2233boys said:![]()
I'll do it again if I like. In fact...
How does that grab you...
fortdick said:Coach Parcells,
But at what cost did the defense come? Our drafts have been heavy on defensive ends and linebackers. We have ignored the offense for the most part, trading away our first round pick in 2004 when we desperately needed a running back. We sat watching the likes of Vinny Testaverde and Cocaine Carter as QB while we focused on molding the defense in your image. You know defense, I will give you that, but, your efforts on offense have not been spectacular. We have suffered through last year watching you play offense, "not to lose."
.
peplaw06 said:Hey everyone... Isn't it Tom Landry...? I believe that the original poster may have misspelled the name. Not much of a Cowboys fan if you ask me.
![]()
tothewhipbill said:so waiving henson is the final straw?
i had a lot more problem when i heard they were actually gonna implement the 3-4 Defense - effectively rendering much of our roster into square pegs in round holes (and look how that is working out - yippeeee!).
but henson?
do ya think some may be overstating henson's importance in anything other than the banking industry?
talk about a non-event...
CowboysFaninDC said:this was the biggest crock of sh!!t letter . . .
CowboysFaninDC said:what BP did was simply make the team better.
CowboysFaninDC said:He and other informed fans know when you have a good defense you have a chance. if you don't then you have no chance. you become the KC of the NFL. score a ton of points and nothing to show for it. see pittsburgh, see new england. see carolina. see the eagles. all of those teams had good dominating defenses.
CowboysFaninDC said:as for you comment of play not to lose. did you check who our tackles were last year. did you even ****ing check the offensive ranking of the team before Adams' injury. we were a top 5 offense and that was playing against the likes of eagles, washington and giants. two playoff teams and a team that was a superbowl favorite before their injuries. so get your facts straight before you spew nonesense.
CowboysFaninDC said:plus get over the notion that they ignored the offensive side. is barber, witten, fasano, JJ, rogers, peterman, crayton, romo, henson.any of those players not ofefnsive players? the issue is they missed on a few, namely rogers, peterman and henson.
CowboysFaninDC said:there are only so many draft picks and so many FAs. or do you believe in the Commanders philosophy of over paying year in year out and have nothing to show for it. yes they are the paper champions of the pre-season. year in year out.
CowboysFaninDC said:headlines in the summer don't equal trophies in january!!!!
CowboysFaninDC said:I think this was one of the stupidest things I have yet read. . . . .so give me a break. open your eyes because you are missing the forest because of the trees.
CrazyCowboy said:if you have an address, I will print off the letter and mail it for you.
fortdick said:See Chicago. Is that what you want this team to be?
wileedog said:Do you really think this offense is even close to Chicago bad? Honestly?
The backs are solid. The QB has his warts, but is light years ahead of anything on the Bears. The receiving corps, including Witten, is arguably among the best in the game. The only question marks are on the O-line, and Bill tried to address that. he just missed. It happens to every coach.
If you want to be critical of Parcells and his play calling, fine (the same offensive philosophy, BTW, which won the Steelers a SB last year). But just don't make crap up to fit your argument.
Again, the Steelers won last year with a suffocating defense, ball control, and using the run to set up play action passes. That's what Bill preaches. That's what he's trying to build here, as fast as he can.fortdick said:talk about making up crap! All I asked is if the Bears were what he preferred. Quit trolling jsut to flame folks. His conservative game plans are a flaw in his coaching. I am not making that up. It has been said by most writers broadcasters, and readers on this site. See this thread: http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61636
You can't call out players the way he does and expect them to sacrifice for you. LANDRY and Johnson never did it.
EMMITTnROY said:i just wanted to let everyone know that there is a MUCH better "Open Letter" over in the Off Topic Zone..
wileedog said:This is the funniest thing yet.
Name me one other coach whose former players talk about him with the sheer reverance that almost all of Bill's do. Those Giant teams would walk through walls for him. Same with his ex Pats and Jet players. Why do you think guys like Terry, Fabini, Keyshawn, AGlenn, etc all jump at the chance to play for him again? You don't think he ever "called them out before" at any point in their careers? (what does that even mean, anyway?)
Parcells has built a career on motivating guys to outwork the other team. A HOF career at that. But you don't like the way he treated a third string QB so now you're going to write a letter about it. Good for you.
fortdick said:Okay, you guys win. Parcells has no flaws. He is the perfect coach.
If we go again 9-7 this year, I will return.
5Stars said:Oh, stop! You have a right to your opinion just like everyone else! Parcells has many flaws, but, compared to what us Cowboy fans have been through prior to his coming here...I'm glad he's here! If for nothing else...to teach JJ how to stop trying to be the hero!
Now, if Parcells could just teach JJ how to, either shut up to the media, or teach him not to SMACK his freaking lips if he does talk!
Now, go do your laundry...and everything will be alright...![]()
![]()