The funniest thing about you Nors is your hypocrisy.Nors;2410579 said:I was Romo over your boy Henson all day everday. Documented and pawned.....
I thought Benching Bledsoe was a mistake and 2006 playoff loss no vindication. Long on Romo - and right move in retro. I have a Romo authentic game 1 start hanging in my room. move on
This is NFL Zone on Detroit QB's in 2008 three years from now you will want to supress the "search" button - LOL
Hostile;2411716 said:The funniest thing about you Nors is your hypocrisy.
You have the temerity to tell others to "move on," yet you constantly thump your chest about what you were right about as if it shows you as some kind of genius.
Newsflash, you aren't a football genius Nors. You aren't even someone I would recommend people listen to. Quite frankly, your opinions on football are a punch line more often than worth listening to.
5 years from now you will be the same pathetic caricature of a self proclaimed football guru when in fact all you have ever been in that regard is a wannabe. It is hilarious that you don't know the difference between "pawned" and the Internet lingo "pwned." The best part is that by calling it "pawned" you "pwned" yourself.
The topic is your silly agenda. We hijacked the thread.Nors;2411758 said:The king chest thumper you are
This is a discussion board on off hours to talk football, I have no ego or self perceived greatness or grandeur. hello/mirror/kettle/black?
This is a Dan Orlovsky Lion discussion. PLease dial in to topic.
Le Culp spit the bit - clearly
Nors;2411488 said:The Big O is going to get a 3 year $10M deal to challenge a starter. Maybe in Detroit.....
Nors;2411559 said:I agree with Nors,
Signed
Matt Schaub, Derek Anderson, Jake Delehomme
Nors;2411823 said:Orlovsky would have been a better backup than Brad Johnson.
Thanks for making my point Hostile.
BraveHeartFan;2411819 said:Ha. We'll see. What a waste of money, and space, a team would do with that.
Schaub is average, at best, and frankly not nearly worth the money they gave him. Derek Anderson quite frankly was a HORRIBLE reach of a signing and the Browns are clearly finding that out now. Jake I'll have to give you cause the guy is a solid QB although he did look more like another Big O yesterday while playing against Oakland.
When is that trade going to happen? You said it will.Nors;2411823 said:Orlovsky would have been a better backup than Brad Johnson.
Thanks for making my point Hostile.
Nors;2410573 said:Troy Aikman won how many games first season as a starter?
BraveHeartFan;2411034 said:I disagree. I believe they'll be drafting a QB with their high number one and they'll probably be going with him over Stanton right from the start. Just what I think though.
Hostile;2411861 said:When is that trade going to happen? You said it will.
What does your 6 year old nephew say? Oh wait, nevermind, he doesn't know anything either. We've already proven that.
Who is?Nors;2412087 said:Too bad - Orlovsky so greater than Brad Johnson. Laughable to even try and argue that -
Nors;2412087 said:Too bad - Orlovsky so greater than Brad Johnson. Laughable to even try and argue that -
DaBoys4Life;2412209 said:Our offense would look the same under Orlovsky as it did under Brad.
Nors;2412246 said:That is where you are so wrong.
But I called Romo over Henson here - And Orlovsky is far greater than Le Culp or BRAD JOHNSON....:laugh1:
Nors;2412246 said:That is where you are so wrong.
But I called Romo over Henson here - And Orlovsky is far greater than Le Culp or BRAD JOHNSON....:laugh1:
joseephuss;2412518 said:I would hope that Orlovsky is better than Culpepper at this point. Culpepper has been with the team for a week and can't possibly know the offense, be in shape since he hasn't been playing or have any timing with the receivers. What a difficult task it must be for Orlovsky to be better than that? Once Culpepper has adjusted to being a lion, he will be the better QB. He may not be a good QB, but relative to the Big O Culpepper will be better.