Orlovsky out (fractured hand) Culp in

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
I disagree with Nors.

Signed,

Every mentally sound person on the planet.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Nors;2410579 said:
I was Romo over your boy Henson all day everday. Documented and pawned.....

I thought Benching Bledsoe was a mistake and 2006 playoff loss no vindication. Long on Romo - and right move in retro. I have a Romo authentic game 1 start hanging in my room. move on

This is NFL Zone on Detroit QB's in 2008 three years from now you will want to supress the "search" button - LOL
The funniest thing about you Nors is your hypocrisy.

You have the temerity to tell others to "move on," yet you constantly thump your chest about what you were right about as if it shows you as some kind of genius.

Newsflash, you aren't a football genius Nors. You aren't even someone I would recommend people listen to. Quite frankly, your opinions on football are a punch line more often than worth listening to.

5 years from now you will be the same pathetic caricature of a self proclaimed football guru when in fact all you have ever been in that regard is a wannabe. It is hilarious that you don't know the difference between "pawned" and the Internet lingo "pwned." The best part is that by calling it "pawned" you "pwned" yourself.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Hostile;2411716 said:
The funniest thing about you Nors is your hypocrisy.

You have the temerity to tell others to "move on," yet you constantly thump your chest about what you were right about as if it shows you as some kind of genius.

Newsflash, you aren't a football genius Nors. You aren't even someone I would recommend people listen to. Quite frankly, your opinions on football are a punch line more often than worth listening to.

5 years from now you will be the same pathetic caricature of a self proclaimed football guru when in fact all you have ever been in that regard is a wannabe. It is hilarious that you don't know the difference between "pawned" and the Internet lingo "pwned." The best part is that by calling it "pawned" you "pwned" yourself.

The king chest thumper you are
:eek:
This is a discussion board on off hours to talk football, I have no ego or self perceived greatness or grandeur. hello/mirror/kettle/black?

This is a Dan Orlovsky Lion discussion. PLease dial in to topic.

Le Culp spit the bit - clearly
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Nors;2411758 said:
The king chest thumper you are
:eek:
This is a discussion board on off hours to talk football, I have no ego or self perceived greatness or grandeur. hello/mirror/kettle/black?

This is a Dan Orlovsky Lion discussion. PLease dial in to topic.

Le Culp spit the bit - clearly
The topic is your silly agenda. We hijacked the thread.

Get used to it.

Here's a blast from the past for a ton of laughs. Note the title. "The trade that will happen."

The one that happened is the one I reported last September. I bet you tied one on that night. Do you ever wonder what it feels like to be right?

Keep on wondering.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
Nors;2411488 said:
The Big O is going to get a 3 year $10M deal to challenge a starter. Maybe in Detroit.....

Ha. We'll see. What a waste of money, and space, a team would do with that.

Nors;2411559 said:
I agree with Nors,

Signed

Matt Schaub, Derek Anderson, Jake Delehomme


Schaub is average, at best, and frankly not nearly worth the money they gave him. Derek Anderson quite frankly was a HORRIBLE reach of a signing and the Browns are clearly finding that out now. Jake I'll have to give you cause the guy is a solid QB although he did look more like another Big O yesterday while playing against Oakland.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Orlovsky would have been a better backup than Brad Johnson.

Thanks for making my point Hostile.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
Nors;2411823 said:
Orlovsky would have been a better backup than Brad Johnson.

Thanks for making my point Hostile.


You'd be a better back up than Brad Johnson. Should Dallas run out and give you a 10 million dollar deal to be there?

No. Obviously not.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
BraveHeartFan;2411819 said:
Ha. We'll see. What a waste of money, and space, a team would do with that.




Schaub is average, at best, and frankly not nearly worth the money they gave him. Derek Anderson quite frankly was a HORRIBLE reach of a signing and the Browns are clearly finding that out now. Jake I'll have to give you cause the guy is a solid QB although he did look more like another Big O yesterday while playing against Oakland.

$10M / 3 year deal is not a lot for a backup/starter in 2009 $$$$
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Brad Johnson

3/5/2007: Signed a three-year, $7.5 million contract. The deal included a $2.5 million signing bonus. 2007 $1.5M, 2008: $2 million, 2009: $1.5 million, 2010: Social Security
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Nors;2411823 said:
Orlovsky would have been a better backup than Brad Johnson.

Thanks for making my point Hostile.
When is that trade going to happen? You said it will.

What does your 6 year old nephew say? Oh wait, nevermind, he doesn't know anything either. We've already proven that.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
Nors;2410573 said:
Troy Aikman won how many games first season as a starter?


zero and he was a complete loser then.....i say complete cause he won zero games. However, he won more games than any other QB in the 90s and 3 SBs.

as good as Danny White was for us, he never won the big game and so he isn't even given a second thought. If Romo doesn't get his head out of his butt, he is gonna be the second coming of White.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
BraveHeartFan;2411034 said:
I disagree. I believe they'll be drafting a QB with their high number one and they'll probably be going with him over Stanton right from the start. Just what I think though.

I think they go O Line first I liked Stanton in college so I may be bias but I think he could be successful at this level. There's a ridiculous good OT in the draft and they would be stoopid not to draft him.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Hostile;2411861 said:
When is that trade going to happen? You said it will.

What does your 6 year old nephew say? Oh wait, nevermind, he doesn't know anything either. We've already proven that.


Too bad - Orlovsky so greater than Brad Johnson. Laughable to even try and argue that -
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Nors;2412087 said:
Too bad - Orlovsky so greater than Brad Johnson. Laughable to even try and argue that -
Who is?

Oh that's right no one.

What's that on your face? It looks like egg.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
Nors;2412087 said:
Too bad - Orlovsky so greater than Brad Johnson. Laughable to even try and argue that -

Our offense would look the same under Orlovsky as it did under Brad.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
DaBoys4Life;2412209 said:
Our offense would look the same under Orlovsky as it did under Brad.

That is where you are so wrong.

But I called Romo over Henson here - And Orlovsky is far greater than Le Culp or BRAD JOHNSON....:laugh1:
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
Nors;2412246 said:
That is where you are so wrong.

But I called Romo over Henson here - And Orlovsky is far greater than Le Culp or BRAD JOHNSON....:laugh1:

Based on what a couple of fluke big plays because of Calvin Johnson ?
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Nors;2412246 said:
That is where you are so wrong.

But I called Romo over Henson here - And Orlovsky is far greater than Le Culp or BRAD JOHNSON....:laugh1:

I would hope that Orlovsky is better than Culpepper at this point. Culpepper has been with the team for a week and can't possibly know the offense, be in shape since he hasn't been playing or have any timing with the receivers. What a difficult task it must be for Orlovsky to be better than that? Once Culpepper has adjusted to being a lion, he will be the better QB. He may not be a good QB, but relative to the Big O Culpepper will be better.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
joseephuss;2412518 said:
I would hope that Orlovsky is better than Culpepper at this point. Culpepper has been with the team for a week and can't possibly know the offense, be in shape since he hasn't been playing or have any timing with the receivers. What a difficult task it must be for Orlovsky to be better than that? Once Culpepper has adjusted to being a lion, he will be the better QB. He may not be a good QB, but relative to the Big O Culpepper will be better.

Le Culp in 2008 is terrible. Big O will get his $ in free agency - Book it
 
Top