Other teams cap casualties

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
AdamJT13;3258081 said:
It's actually one big-money UFA -- anything above a certain amount, with no upper limit.

And as others have mentioned, anyone who is cut by another team won't count against our signing restrictions.

Thanks for clarifying. Well that's good to know. I'd love to pick up an interior OL of starting quality who is still relatively young. I wouldn't fuss about picking up a #2/3 WR either. And a ball hawking FS would be just dandy.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
ArmyCowboy;3259310 said:
I'm not Adam, but I know many teams are going to be dumping salary because there won't be a cap hit for doing it next year.

Some of the one's I've heard that are pretty sure to be cut are

Antrell Rolle
Lito Sheppard
Landanian Tomlinson
I won't be shocked if Merriman is gone in SD too.
 

tko112204

Active Member
Messages
601
Reaction score
46
Hostile;3259562 said:
I won't be shocked if Merriman is gone in SD too.

He's a RFA though, right? I could see them just letting him walk. He says he wants to be "respected" by the Chargers. What a joke.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
MarionBarberThe4th;3257690 said:
So we can sign anyone who is cut no problem.

Theres some rumblings about Alan Faneca who is due a $9.5M bonus soon. Hes way older and would be a stop-gap but he is a fiery leader who knows every OL responsibilty.

Who else might be cut?

no, we dont need any past their prime guys here
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Hostile;3259562 said:
I won't be shocked if Merriman is gone in SD too.

Just as long as he ends up somewhere other than Dallas.

Merriman= washed up
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
Hostile;3259562 said:
I won't be shocked if Merriman is gone in SD too.

Actually, I can see the Chargers slapping a second round tender on him and then hoping like hell someone offers him a contract.
 

sureletsrace

Official CZ Homer
Messages
4,622
Reaction score
4,197
MarionBarberThe4th;3261499 said:
Trade ideas are mostly dumb so Ill put this here. Anthony Gonzalez?

I'd jump all over this, but I don't think he'll be going anywhere.
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
MarionBarberThe4th;3261557 said:
Well they got Wayne, Garçon, and Collie. He could be on the block.

But what's so good about him? He put up two 600 yard seasons with Payton Manning as his QB. He has been injured all last year. We get that kind of production from RW and Crayton already. RW's contract is guaranteed and Crayton can also return punts. I really don't see what he'd do here except get in KO's way who I think has a much higher ceiling.

He'd probably be playing the same role here as there - 4th or 5th WR.

What do you want to offer? I would give no more than a conditional 6th rounder if he could get more than 800 yards receiving.
 

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,414
Reaction score
5,389
Eskimo;3261564 said:
But what's so good about him? He put up two 600 yard seasons with Payton Manning as his QB. He has been injured all last year. We get that kind of production from RW and Crayton already. RW's contract is guaranteed and Crayton can also return punts. I really don't see what he'd do here except get in KO's way who I think has a much higher ceiling.

He'd probably be playing the same role here as there - 4th or 5th WR.

What do you want to offer? I would give no more than a conditional 6th rounder if he could get more than 800 yards receiving.

Add onto that the Peyton factor. I hear you. But he is a good looking young WR.



-I dont know what Julius is making but hes gone
 

sureletsrace

Official CZ Homer
Messages
4,622
Reaction score
4,197
Eskimo;3261564 said:
But what's so good about him? He put up two 600 yard seasons with Payton Manning as his QB. He has been injured all last year. We get that kind of production from RW and Crayton already. RW's contract is guaranteed and Crayton can also return punts. I really don't see what he'd do here except get in KO's way who I think has a much higher ceiling.

He'd probably be playing the same role here as there - 4th or 5th WR.

What do you want to offer? I would give no more than a conditional 6th rounder if he could get more than 800 yards receiving.

Uh, he's been their #3-#4 receiver, and getting 600 yards. He's been groomed under the most dominant WR of recent times Marvin Harrison, and was fully primed and ready to take over the #1 role before his injury. The Colts had him listed as the #1 WR over Reggie Wayne. They obviously saw something about him that was better than the guy who just put up 1264 yards and 10 touchdowns.

Pretty sure he 1) won't be going anywhere, and 2) would cost WAY more than a conditional 6th.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,150
Reaction score
27,235
jswalker1981;3258840 said:
Adam, do you know if we can restructure contracts to move more of the payout to this year since there is no cap? I'm wondering if it is possible so that when the cap comes back, we will be in even better shape.

I believe the 30% rule is still in effect.

This rule states that a player's salary cannot differ more than 30% for contracts. In other words, Jerry cannot pay a player more than 130% of their 2009 salary in 2010, assuming it is a reworked contract and not an expired contract. I mean, Miles Austin can get paid more than 130% of his 2009 pay since his contract has expired, but they couldnt redo Romo's contract and pay him like 3 times what he made in 2009.

At least that is my understanding of the situation, I could be wrong.
 

Nexx

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,041
Reaction score
5,476
can i haz antrel rolle of the cards if they cut him?
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
sureletsrace;3261608 said:
Uh, he's been their #3-#4 receiver, and getting 600 yards. He's been groomed under the most dominant WR of recent times Marvin Harrison, and was fully primed and ready to take over the #1 role before his injury. The Colts had him listed as the #1 WR over Reggie Wayne. They obviously saw something about him that was better than the guy who just put up 1264 yards and 10 touchdowns.

Pretty sure he 1) won't be going anywhere, and 2) would cost WAY more than a conditional 6th.

Show me one reliable source that Gonzalez was going to be the #1 WR over Reggie Wayne. Until then I'm calling BS.
 

lkelly

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,950
Reaction score
6,417
Eskimo;3263782 said:
Show me one reliable source that Gonzalez was going to be the #1 WR over Reggie Wayne. Until then I'm calling BS.

Perhaps he meant "listed" alphabetically on the roster.
 
Top