Pacman suspended for 2007; Henry suspended 8 games

[Bob Sacamano]

due process for the laymen

trial, judge, jury

 

[theogt]

Sounds like a DPC argument to me....

Back to you Dale Jr.

Where's the Due Process claim? I'm not seeing it. Lawyers will often throw around weighty terms like due process to the public or to juries to sway opinion. He's not making a Due Process claim, though. You should clearly see that.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Oh oh, now you've done it.

done what?

really, I have no idea what I've dun

 

[the kid 05]

what in the deuce is going on?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Welcome to "niche knowledge night" at the Zone. The snottier you are, the better.

:laugh2:

 

[Hostile]

Sounds like a DPC argument to me....

Back to you Dale Jr.

:laugh2:

 

[peplaw06]

Where's the Due Process claim? I'm not seeing it. Lawyers will often throw around weighty terms like due process to the public or to juries to sway opinion. He's not making a Due Process claim, though. You should clearly see that.

Argument...

I may have said claim one time in the first post where I posted this, but I've been asking if he's making an argument. He clearly is arguing from a DPC line of thought.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Sounds like a DPC argument to me....

Back to you Dale Jr.

if it walks a like a duck, and quacks like a dog

no wait, if it barks like a duck, and quacks like a duck

I mean, aww, forget it

 

[theogt]

Argument...

I may have said claim one time in the first post where I posted this, but I've been asking if he's making an argument. He clearly is arguing from a DPC line of thought.

Oh...he's arguing from a DPC line of thought...ok.

But why? Because it's a legally actionable theory? Or is he simply using policy to bolster his argument?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Oh...he's arguing from a DPC line of thought...ok.

But why? Because it's a legally actionable theory? Or is he simply using policy to bolster his argument?

like you and peplaw have been saying, lawyers will argue anything

 

[theogt]

like you and peplaw have been saying, lawyers will argue anything

Particularly when it comes to arguing policy. When you throw around language like "due process" people get riled up. They start thinking about civil rights and such. It's effective from a persuasion standpoint, but it's not an actional legal theory.

I mean, let's be honest. Which is more sexy? Due Process? Or tortious interference with prospective business relations? One of them is an actionable claim. The other is simply made up.

 

[peplaw06]

due process for the laymen

trial, judge, jury

Very good... well that's the basics of procedural due process... then there's "substantive due process"............

ahhhhh nevermind

 

[WoodysGirl]

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/merry_go_round_fair_400.jpg

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Particularly when it comes to arguing policy. When you throw around language like "due process" people get riled up. They start thinking about civil rights and such. It's effective from a persuasion standpoint, but it's not an actional legal theory.

it's actionable if cops are holding you in a cell w/o just cause, but I get what you're saying

 

[peplaw06]

Oh...he's arguing from a DPC line of thought...ok.

But why? Because it's a legally actionable theory? Or is he simply using policy to bolster his argument?

Ahhhh, but counselor... I don't believe this beating of a thread was started over whether DPC was an actionable legal theory. I believe you jumped on Hos because you thought he was saying DPC was a "compelling argument."

 

[Hostile]

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/merry_go_round_fair_400.jpg

Giddyup.

 

[Hostile]

Ahhhh, but counselor... I don't believe this beating of a thread was started over whether DPC was an actionable legal theory. I believe you jumped on Hos because you thought he was saying DPC was a "compelling argument."

 

[theogt]

Ahhhh, but counselor... I don't believe this beating of a thread was started over whether DPC was an actionable legal theory. I believe you jumped on Hos because you thought he was saying DPC was a "compelling argument."

Actually, I just stated from the beginning that the NFL is not required to provide Due Process. I believe my original post on that subject wasn't even to Hos.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Very good... well that's the basics of procedural due process... then there's "substantive due process"............

ahhhhh nevermind

you're on the list

fuzzylumpkins list!!

 

[DallasEast]

We have lawyers and pseudo lawyers running amok all over this thread. Is there any JUDGES out there who can finally put this argument to bed? Anyone?

Where's Judge Judy when you need her?