Yakuza Rich
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,043
- Reaction score
- 12,385
Hoofbite;5052409 said:Zimmer got excused?
Guess we recall things different.
By many people on this forum...yes, he did.
YR
Hoofbite;5052409 said:Zimmer got excused?
Guess we recall things different.
Rogah;5052500 said:Bill Parcells career playoff victories without Bill Belichick on his staff: 0 (in 7 years as a head coach)
Rogah;5052789 said:Not to informed football fans who know exactly what I'm talking about.
He was officially the assistant head coach and unofficially the defensive coordinator.
Actually the Browns did win a playoff game in January, 1995, under Bill Belichick. Who'd they beat? Bill Parcells' New England Patriots.
The simple, undeniable fact of the matter is that in 7 years of being a head coach without Bill Belichick, Bill Parcells has never won a single playoff game.
Rogah;5052789 said:Not to informed football fans who know exactly what I'm talking about.
He was officially the assistant head coach and unofficially the defensive coordinator.
Actually the Browns did win a playoff game in January, 1995, under Bill Belichick. Who'd they beat? Bill Parcells' New England Patriots.
The simple, undeniable fact of the matter is that in 7 years of being a head coach without Bill Belichick, Bill Parcells has never won a single playoff game.
That's true. In the 8 years since those guys left, Belichick has won an abysmal 8 playoff games, including 2 conference championships (stats most HC's would kill for).burmafrd;5052826 said:and Belliceks record in the SB since Weis and Crennel left: 0-2
2 conference championships and 8 playoffs games. There's probably no more than 1 or 2 HC's that can make that same claim over the past 8 years.burmafrd;5052828 said:and what has Bellicek won since Weis and Crennel left?
So did the 2000 Patriots. I've never claimed the guy never had any down years. I'm just saying that in 7 years of being an HC without Bill Belichick, Bill Parcells never won a single playoff game.Hoofbite;5052857 said:The 1995 Browns went 5-11.
It can be a fact. It can also be pretty damn meaningless.
Rogah;5052918 said:So did the 2000 Patriots. I've never claimed the guy never had any down years. I'm just saying that in 7 years of being an HC without Bill Belichick, Bill Parcells never won a single playoff game.
You show me a great coach and I'll show you some great players.Risen Star;5052999 said:You can play that game with little Bill too. He was a losing coach before Tom Brady. Got fired in Cleveland. Was mediocre in New England until the all timer came along.
And all Parcells has done is show he can win with the greatest defensive player ever to play the game - not to mention a future Hall of Fame coach working for him.Risen Star;5052999 said:I'll take Parcells over him. He can show up anywhere and turn around any team regardless of the cast of characters he's got to work with. At any age, too. All Belichick was proven is he can win big with arguably the greatest QB ever to play the game.
Rogah;5053149 said:You show me a great coach and I'll show you some great players.
burmafrd;5051798 said:That D was nowhere near as good as the stats made it look like. When it went up against a good O it usually got owned. That year the schedule had few really good O's. Carolina and the Pats were about the best we ran into and they scored well on us.
Bill Walsh and Joe Montana say hi. And so do Chuck Noll and Terry Bradshaw.InmanRoshi;5054149 said:But rarely has there ever been a great coach who has a clear line of demarcation in his career revolving around just one specific individual player.
As the old saying goes: You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not, however, entitled to your own facts.Yakuza Rich;5054138 said:I'd take Parcells over Belichick any day.
One guy desecrated the game by blatantly breaking the rules despite recently being reminded that it was against the rules. Then he lied each and every step of the way after getting caught. First saying that they didn't do it. Then saying they only did it a little bit. Then saying that they only did it against the opposing team's defense. And also never acknowledging the accusations by other teams that they were messing with their radio signals.
Rogah;5054381 said:As the old saying goes: You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not, however, entitled to your own facts.
Please educate yourself as to what actually happened and I'll be happy to further discuss the matter with you. I cannot, however, discuss the matter with someone who has no clue what happened.