Parnell to start this year?

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
91,046
Thank erod for posting this quote from Jerry in his conference call to season ticket holders.




erod;5074129 said:
1. Parnell is going to start at RT, and Free has the option to take a paycut to remain as the top backup or be released. That seemed to be Jerry's cryptic message.


We signed Parnell off of the Saints practice squad. He was more of a Basketball player in College. I believe he only played 1 year of football prior to the NFL.

I gotta say he looked solid against Pittsburgh last year but worried me a little more against 4 man fronts.
 
He was a converted TE when he was on the Saints PS. I am not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. I guess we will see how it pans out.
 
I'm all for this. I thought he showed enough in his four game audition late last year to be given the chance to start.
 
honyock;5074186 said:
I'm all for this. I thought he showed enough in his four game audition late last year to be given the chance to start.

I'm with ya.
 
So no Winston or Clabo?


So all we did to fix this abomination of an oline was to add a center we had a 2nd round grade on. Seriously, that's it.



Thanks Jerry:rolleyes:
 
Fine with me. A great OLine doesn't require a bunch of high picks, but rather cohesion, and Parnell had a ton of upside,
 
Beast_from_East;5074199 said:
So no Winston or Clabo?


So all we did to fix this abomination of an oline was to add a center we had a 2nd round grade on. Seriously, that's it.



Thanks Jerry:rolleyes:

I got a feeling they may still be in the mix ,but since they aren't on the roster yet, then this may be the current status of that situation.
 
Really hope not. Jerry needs to open the checkbook and get either Clabo or Winston here. Just too much of a risk for me to go into the season with Parnell as the starter.
 
tm1119;5074212 said:
Really hope not. Jerry needs to open the checkbook and get either Clabo or Winston here. Just too much of a risk for me to go into the season with Parnell as the starter.

And yet everyone was clamouring for a rook tackle? Constantly buying band aids is not how you build a line.
 
TheRomoSexual;5074216 said:
And yet everyone was clamouring for a rook tackle? Constantly buying band aids is not how you build a line.

Hoping a practice squad guy sticks isn't either. This team's record of developing offensive lineman over the last 10 years is putrid.

I have no problem with giving Parnell a shot. But Winston or Clabo must be brought in to compete. If Parnell is good enough, he'll beat them out. If he's not.. well, good thing we signed Winston/Clabo then, right?

We've got to stop kicking the can down the road and hoping these longshots pan out.
 
If Free isn't off this ing roster by June 1 I will lose faith in the entire organization. I'm hanging on by a thread as it is. Get that hack out of Dallas.
 
I'm actually more worried about RG, not RT........unless costa starts at center and Fredrick at guard.
 
DOUBLE WING;5074224 said:
Hoping a practice squad guy sticks isn't either. This team's record of developing offensive lineman over the last 10 years is putrid.

I have no problem with giving Parnell a shot. But Winston or Clabo must be brought in to compete. If Parnell is good enough, he'll beat them out. If he's not.. well, good thing we signed Winston/Clabo then, right?

We've got to stop kicking the can down the road and hoping these longshots pan out.

Calling Parnell a "practice squad guy" is completely disengenuous. He started for us last year and played enough to give the coaches an idea of what they have with him.

By the by, a lot of people were high on M. Watson, but really, is there much difference between Watson's and Parnell's respective backgrounds?
 
theranchsucks;5074232 said:
I'm actually more worried about RG, not RT........unless costa starts at center and Fredrick at guard.

But I thought the entire purpose of drafting Frederick was to have a foundation in the center of the line that would allow Romo to step up into the pocket?

Isnt that what Jerry said at his presser, that LT can C had to be studs and they could fill in the rest later?


Playing Fredrick at guard would pretty much make all this just BS.
 
Beast_from_East;5074244 said:
But I thought the entire purpose of drafting Frederick was to have a foundation in the center of the line that would allow Romo to step up into the pocket?

Isnt that what Jerry said at his presser, that LT can C had to be studs and they could fill in the rest later?


Playing Fredrick at guard would pretty much make all this just BS.

Jerry also said Wilcox was going to start.

I kinda just roll my eyes when he starts announcing starters. Especially rookies.


From what i've seen Frederick looks much better as a guard although he only played center 1 year.
 
I'm happy to here about Parnell starting. As long as free isn't close to the field. Hopefully he refuses a pay cut and gets his butt canned.
 
Beast_from_East;5074244 said:
But I thought the entire purpose of drafting Frederick was to have a foundation in the center of the line that would allow Romo to step up into the pocket?

Isnt that what Jerry said at his presser, that LT can C had to be studs and they could fill in the rest later?


Playing Fredrick at guard would pretty much make all this just BS.

That's not at all what was said. He said having a guy like Fred who can play guard or center solidifies the interior, which makes sense in light of our injury issues last season.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,041
Messages
14,508,680
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top