Paul Krueger over Spencer?

visionary;5015359 said:
while that is funny and true (as in no way do i recommend signing krueger to a long-term deal)

but the only reason they had kreuger's picture there (instead of spencer) was because they have had spencer's picture under the phrase "no good years" for a long time and hadnt moved it over yet

Don't quit your day job.
 
visionary;5015456 said:
can you remind me when the last time is that spencer started in the NFL as a DE?

for how many games in the NFL?

because that is the position he will be playing full time and be paid like a premier DE

i will wait for your answer

If you want to play that game, when was the last time Ware started in the NFL as a DE?
 
visionary;5015456 said:
can you remind me when the last time is that spencer started in the NFL as a DE?

for how many games in the NFL?

because that is the position he will be playing full time and be paid like a premier DE

i will wait for your answer

So we should get Kruger because he has played that role so much in the NFL. Great logic
 
visionary;5015456 said:
can you remind me when the last time is that spencer started in the NFL as a DE?

for how many games in the NFL?

because that is the position he will be playing full time and be paid like a premier DE

i will wait for your answer

But it is funny to see your redirect after your "no good seasons" argument went south.
 
AbeBeta;5015470 said:
So we should get Kruger because he has played that role so much in the NFL. Great logic

please read my post again

i clearly state that i am not in favor of signing kreuger
 
visionary;5015473 said:
:laugh2:

did we just franchise ware and are thinking of signing him to a long-term deal?

did i just miss that or is this a childish attempt at distraction?

The "childish attempt" is you dodging my question.
 
jjktkk;5015465 said:
If you want to play that game, when was the last time Ware started in the NFL as a DE?
funny how fans question whether spencer can play de but no one questions whether ware can play de. to me both will be just fine but sometimes i wonder when people raise concerns about one guy but not the next guy. agenda maybe?
 
MonsterD;5015082 said:
I think he is at least as good as Spencer and would have cost about 9-10 annually. I actually think he might be better than Spencer eventually. I really hope Spencer does not cost anything close to him.

he is not. he was taken out on running downs and brought in on passing downs mostly. he is slightly above average at that.
 
visionary;5015474 said:
please read my post again

i clearly state that i am not in favor of signing kreuger

so you just go from thread to thread to bash Spencer.

you shoulda stuck with "I like Kreuger"
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,206
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top