rkell87
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,443
- Reaction score
- 880
Everlastingxxx;3289909 said:I agree. That would be fine with me.
this just makes sense to me. and if you want, on the third possession no more field goals.
Everlastingxxx;3289909 said:I agree. That would be fine with me.
It'll never get to a vote, because it's idiotic. Just like half the other ideas Goodell comes up with. Every month there's some new way he's trying to **** up the NFL. The guy's a 'tard that's trying to leave his footprint on the NFL and stupid ideas like this just reek of Goodell.Hoofbite;3289722 said:Maybe it is but it would go to a vote, something he couldn't be blamed for.
rkell87;3289935 said:this just makes sense to me. and if you want, on the third possession no more field goals.
theogt;3289943 said:It'll never get to a vote, because it's idiotic. Just like half the other ideas Goodell comes up with. Every month there's some new way he's trying to **** up the NFL. The guy's a 'tard that's trying to leave his footprint on the NFL and stupid ideas like this just reek of Goodell.
Muhast;3289945 said:I am absolutely 100% against taking out special teams. It's a huge part of the game and always has been.
Add a fifth quarter. If it's still tied, then go sudden death.
NextGenBoys;3289817 said:Screw playoffs only, it should be like that for ALL games.
That's a great idea.