Hoofbite
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,895
- Reaction score
- 11,620
dreghorn2;4204392 said:Take a look at the documentary "the Cove', might have you rethinking the whole Sea World experience.
A synopsis would be appreciated.
dreghorn2;4204392 said:Take a look at the documentary "the Cove', might have you rethinking the whole Sea World experience.
Hoofbite;4204461 said:A synopsis would be appreciated.
Doomsday101;4204212 said:I guess it proves the theory that some people have too much time on their hands.
Hoofbite;4204461 said:A synopsis would be appreciated.
Steve_Deadload;4204426 said:I hope someday the good people of Tucson get water so they aren't forced into senseless Lobster massacres/feasts by those jerks at PETA.
dreghorn2;4204392 said:Take a look at the documentary "the Cove', might have you rethinking the whole Sea World experience.
zrinkill;4204685 said:Sea World spokesperson Fred Jacobs has responded by saying that, "We think we're being unfairly criticized for something we're opposed to."He adds that, "SeaWorld opposes the dolphin hunts documented in The Cove. We do not purchase any animals from these hunts. More than 80 percent of the marine mammals in our care were born in our parks. We haven't collected a dolphin from the wild in decades."
ConcordCowboy;4204703 said:Maybe not now...but they did at one point.
Fred Jacobs, vice president for communications for SeaWorld, says that in the 1980s SeaWorld "saved" some animals from Japanese drive fisheries. Today, he says, "we do not purchase animals from Taiji or any other Japanese drive fishery." SeaWorld now acquires its dolphins from captive-dolphin births and from rescuing distressed animals.
Sam I Am;4204705 said:They don't anymore. Isn't that what we want?
While PETA has good intentions, they cross boundaries they shouldn't and become PITA instead of PETA.
ConcordCowboy;4204703 said:Maybe not now...but they did at one point.
Fred Jacobs, vice president for communications for SeaWorld, says that in the 1980s SeaWorld "saved" some animals from Japanese drive fisheries. Today, he says, "we do not purchase animals from Taiji or any other Japanese drive fishery." SeaWorld now acquires its dolphins from captive-dolphin births and from rescuing distressed animals.
Ah so because they did it in the past they are still guilty of it. Good to know.ConcordCowboy;4204712 said:Yes that's good...but let's not act like they haven't done it before.
And it's currently illegial...so they can't.
To me that's like saying hey someone killed someone in the 80's but it's 2011 and they haven't done it since so lets forget it.
No.
I will admit though that PETA does go over boards sometimes.
Hostile;4204720 said:Ah so because they did it in the past they are still guilty of it. Good to know.
ConcordCowboy;4204731 said:I didn't say they were still guilty of it...but they were guilty of this practice in the past.
I admitted that they don't do it now...in fact it's illegal...but that we shouldn't FORGET that they have in fact done this in the past.
Whether you chose to forgive and forget is up to you.
zrinkill;4204719 said:So 30+ years ago they bought some animals that were about to be eaten from this group and there is something wrong with that? Isn't that the same thing Peta does?
zrinkill;4204685 said:In the United States it is currently illegal to import dolphins obtained from a drive, including the drive hunt at Taiji, as it is considered an inhumane method.
Sam I Am;4204736 said:What exactly do you want done to them? You are pushing an agenda here (and you have that right), but give us some clue of what you expect to happen.
Should be jail them? Should we release the dolphin that they got? (if it is not dead already)
ConcordCowboy;4204739 said:they should have never been involved with these people in the first place...they payed them money...which only helped and encouraged them to continue this practice.
zrinkill;4204781 said:
ConcordCowboy;4204887 said:Sea World didn't pay money to save those dolphins...they payed money to get dolphins to perform for them so they could make money off of them...not set them free.
If it would have been the same then Sea World would have payed for ALL the dolphins and saved them all...not just the ones that they could make money off of...they could have payed for them all...taken the bottlenose and set the rest free...but they didn't.