Peter King's pick for Sunday

Colo;2947976 said:
Jenny Dell's analysis/prediction is much more fun to watch.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4480172

What the hell kind of math do they use at ESPN??

Jacobs < 50 yds = Giants win 47% of the time.
Jacobs > 50 yds = Giants win 56% of the time.
Jacobs < 75 yds = Giants win 35% of the time.

That's just stupid right there.
 
ChldsPlay;2948097 said:
What the hell kind of math do they use at ESPN??

Jacobs < 50 yds = Giants win 47% of the time.
Jacobs > 50 yds = Giants win 56% of the time.
Jacobs < 75 yds = Giants win 35% of the time.

That's just stupid right there.

:lmao2::lmao2::lmao2::lmao2::lmao2::lmao2::lmao2:

What's the point of including < 75 yds???
 
ChldsPlay;2948097 said:
What the hell kind of math do they use at ESPN??

Jacobs < 50 yds = Giants win 47% of the time.
Jacobs > 50 yds = Giants win 56% of the time.
Jacobs < 75 yds = Giants win 35% of the time.

That's just stupid right there.

Hey, all I said is it is more fun to watch. :cool:
 
I think what this means is that we need to keep Jacobs between 51 and 74 yds, because apparently they have a very low winning % when he's in that area. It's the only way possible for the above stats. Their overall win % drops 12 points from below 50 to below 75, so that means most of the wins they get when he's above 50, he's also above 75, and most of the wins they get when he's below 75, he's also below 50.

I can live with 51-74 yds.
 
MarionBarberThe4th;2947878 said:
Are we going to get punter/video board anecdotes every week?

We get it, some might hit it some just cant. Move on.

Yep, we will.

It's become the ultimate cliche about the Cowboys already.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,629
Messages
13,823,111
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top