percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
Roy has been a bigger problem, no question.Shotgun Dave;2535811 said:If you look at production on the field, TO has played and continues to play CIRCLES around Roy 11.
Roy has been a bigger problem, no question.Shotgun Dave;2535811 said:If you look at production on the field, TO has played and continues to play CIRCLES around Roy 11.
Not this again.Shotgun Dave;2535811 said:If you look at production on the field, TO has played and continues to play CIRCLES around Roy 11. TO has the body of a 25 year old WR - a RIPPED 25 year old WR at that.
theogt;2535677 said:He's "correct" on most of what he says, because he's just pointing at what most people would point at, regardless of whether they had an understanding of the what went wrong or not.
Chocolate Lab;2535828 said:Not this again.
Look, you can go on the innernets and find pictures of 45 year old guys with ripped abs. It doesn't mean they have the same athletic ability they had when they were 25. It just doesn't. You can't tell about quickness and explosion by outward appearances.
Some of you guys act like TO will never age. Do you really believe that? Say that TO lasts a few years longer than most due to the way he takes care of himself. He's STILL going to get old... Like it or not.
And on Roy11, I agree that he looks like crap right now. But we're stuck with him for a long time. And I still think he can be a LOT better than what he's shown the last few games.
Clove;2536032 said:I'm a huge TO fan but I agree also. I also think that with TO gone, Jason Garrett will be forced to make his receivers run their routes properly.
Clove;2536032 said:I'm a huge TO fan but I agree also. I also think that with TO gone, Jason Garrett will be forced to make his receivers run their routes properly.
I would personally prefer a coach who would demand certain things from top to bottom, so that's not going to happen with Jerry at the helm, so may as well get players with less star power, who's job is always on the line.Shotgun Dave;2536069 said:If getting rid of a clear #1 WR is what it takes to get our Assistant Head Coach to do his freaking job, then we need a different Assistant Head Coach.
This is getting comical.
tyke1doe;2535644 said:I know the T.O. apologist don't want to hear this and suckle at his muscle teats to excuse him for complaining about not getting the ball, but T.O. is in Romo's mind, and he represents the "me-first" attitude with this team. It's not going to happen, but T.O., as good as he is, might be an addition by subtraction. Now, I don't know the cap ramifications on cutting him, and I doubt Jerry will do it, but it is my prediction that this team will reach the Super Bowl the year after T.O. leaves.
I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
CaptainAmerica;2535611 said:...
Two: Cut the 34-year-old baby, Terrell Owens. With T.O. gone, Romo could drop back to pass and look for an open receiver -- not an open receiver with the number 81. You simply can't play football that way, and no matter what Romo says,
Hide. Owens is God. Run Forrest run.perrykemp;2536753 said:Brett Favre won his first MVP in 1995, the year after Sterling Sharpe, a HOF caliber WR, had a career ending injury. Sterling Sharpe broke the NFL record for most receptions in a season two years in a row with Favre, and Favre looked for him on pretty much every play. Sterling Sharpe was "the guy" in GB before Favre really became superman and the best thing that ever happened to Favre is the Packers loosing one of the best WR talents in Packer history.
I see parallels here with Romo and Owens. It could very well be that Romo won't take the next step until Owens is gone.
perrykemp;2536753 said:Brett Favre won his first MVP in 1995, the year after Sterling Sharpe, a HOF caliber WR, had a career ending injury. Sterling Sharpe broke the NFL record for most receptions in a season two years in a row with Favre, and Favre looked for him on pretty much every play. Sterling Sharpe was "the guy" in GB before Favre really became superman and the best thing that ever happened to Favre is the Packers loosing one of the best WR talents in Packer history.
I see parallels here with Romo and Owens. It could very well be that Romo won't take the next step until Owens is gone.
tyke1doe;2535644 said:I know the T.O. apologist don't want to hear this and suckle at his muscle teats to excuse him for complaining about not getting the ball, but T.O. is in Romo's mind, and he represents the "me-first" attitude with this team. It's not going to happen, but T.O., as good as he is, might be an addition by subtraction. Now, I don't know the cap ramifications on cutting him, and I doubt Jerry will do it, but it is my prediction that this team will reach the Super Bowl the year after T.O. leaves.
I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
THANK YOU, BURGER KING!!!
This team lives in a delusional world. It thinks it can just step on the field and teams are going to fall over because of all the talent. Talent? What talent?
No, this team is not the most talented in the league, for the reasons King stated above.
Bravo.
Sorry, but Newman played like crap! He is good, NOT great.Chocolate Lab;2535629 said:Well, he got this part right. (Except for Newman playing like a Bowling Green walk-on.)