PFF: Teams with the lowest first-down conversion rate allowed

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,810
Reaction score
46,944
But when it comes to the Cowboys offense, it is near the bottom of the league on first down conversion rate on first and second down....that's NOT so "Special"
True but we are like the top 3 in points scored......look, I'm not saying we are there yet but there are a lot of good things trending in the right direction.
 

pansophy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
4,227
How many first downs have they given up before 3rd down?
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,965
Reaction score
50,818
Our D is not bad. What we still lack is that dominant 3 tech. That one piece would vault us into #1 D territory.

And if Mazi doesn't pan out, we're going to need another 1 tech if Hankins walks.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,171
Reaction score
23,470
True but we are like the top 3 in points scored......look, I'm not saying we are there yet but there are a lot of good things trending in the right direction.
Trending towards early playoff exit at best
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,489
Reaction score
19,626
At first I misunderstood this stat. But aparently it is teh rate that other teams get first downs when they have the football. According to my calculation Dallas has given up the 2nd fewest first downs in the league behind Cleveland. But Dallas and Cleveland have on 8 games vs 9 for New Orleans and Baltimore. This stat is a measurement of the number of 1st downs per set of downs so the number of games is irrelevant.

This is an impressive stat but the 5-3 record shows the Cowboys have had some really good games and some not so good games. The Eagles had 20 first downs against Dallas, 10 passes, 7 rushes, and 3 penalty. The problem for Dallas is most of those 1st downs came on 4 TD drives - which shows that first downs is less important than rate of scoring drives allowed.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,965
Reaction score
50,818
It is completely irrelevant that/if we haven't allowed one single player to rush/receive for 100 yds. ARI rushed for 222 yds against. 222. So, instead of repeating the irrelevant stat that it wasn't one player, explain to me why it matters? 49ers rushed for 170. It's not a victory that it wasn't one player.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,737
Reaction score
22,461
Trending towards early playoff exit at best
This is being blind to overcoming and even in the career of McCarthy in Super Bowl 45. He had 6 starters out and was ranked #6 before beating Pittsburgh...in Dallas and Flozell Adams starting at RT for the Steelers.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
80,577
Reaction score
101,211
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I hate to be negative, but not sure how one would consider this year any different from the previous 2
Well, because it is a new season, and the ending has not been written yet.
Even though the Debbie Downers and Negative Nancies already decided on it. :laugh:
 

shabazz

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,454
Reaction score
35,557
BTW......correct me if I'm wrong but I think we have not allowed a 100-yard rusher or receiver so far
I think I’ve seen that same stat. Other teams have gotten plenty of yards but have spread it around among their various receivers. the Cowboys are Lamb-dependent and the drop off is vast after him

Guess which one is better……the lack of depth and productivity isn’t
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,219
Reaction score
36,771
But when it comes to the Cowboys offense, it is near the bottom of the league on first down conversion rate on first and second down....that's NOT so "Special"

We're killing it on 3rd and 4th then. However, that's tough to sustain. It has to he a hallmark of a poor running game though. Fix that, and those rates change dramatically
 
Top