PFF: Top 10 WR's in the NFL today

CeeDee had nothing to do with it, eh?

If Dak is as good as you're implying, he'd make a lot more WRs look better.

Yet again, your crusade is showing you don't know football. Just here to fight with people.
People have echoed exactly what I said but you call me out? Crazy…..

Lamb was hurt a few games last year. I guess Lamb injury made Pickens a better player?
 
Very few did. TMC lies. Alot. One of the topics of the time was how did Rush achieve such a record? Either AC or TMC suggested the team played better for Rush.

I don't believe that for one second...but if true...certainly brings more questions.
I lie a lot is ironic when you just lied and said me or ac made that claim.
 
#23 to #7????

How'd that happen?????

Couldn't possibly be because of the enormous increase in "counting stats", right??????
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
Or it’s the +.20 increase in yards per route, cut his drop rate in half and nearly doubled his contested catch rate.

Was Pickens horrible the last game of the year because he put up 9 total yards?….or was it because he only played on 10 passing snaps that game?

If the cowboys had rested starters sooner and Flournoy took the bulk of Pickens snaps the last 3 games of the year would we consider him a lesser player because the counting stats would be lower? No chance.

The counting stats matter, but it’s a fraction of the story.

If 2025 counting stats are everything why is Lamb ranked higher than Pickens despite roughly 400 fewer yards?
 
Or it’s the +.20 increase in yards per route, cut his drop rate in half and nearly doubled his contested catch rate.

Was Pickens horrible the last game of the year because he put up 9 total yards?….or was it because he only played on 10 passing snaps that game?

If the cowboys had rested starters sooner and Flournoy took the bulk of Pickens snaps the last 3 games of the year would we consider him a lesser player because the counting stats would be lower? No chance.

The counting stats matter, but it’s a fraction of the story.

If 2025 counting stats are everything why is Lamb ranked higher than Pickens despite roughly 400 fewer yards?
You had to move the goalposts to "2025 counting stats" because CeeDee's counting stats were ELITE before 2025.

And that's why he's considered the better WR. Even though the ANALYTICS YOU CITED had Pickens as the better WR in 2025.

Oops! Hold that L.
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
 
You had to move the goalposts to "2025 counting stats" because CeeDee's counting stats were ELITE before 2025.

And that's why he's considered the better WR. Even though the ANALYTICS YOU CITED had Pickens as the better WR in 2025.

Oops! Hold that L.
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
I'm honestly not trying to move the goal posts at all....I'm simply trying to figure out what your actual argument is since you cherry pick one piece of like 8 examples i've thrown out there over the last few posts. I've thrown out several examples of players like Garrett Wilson, Tee Higgins, Lamb, London, Metcalf, etc. hoping to get some sort of answer from you to advance the conversation.

Honestly I though the most recent season was an impotant factor in what your argument about the counting stats was, no? If not then why isnt Pickens in the top 10 conversation after his 2023 season racking up 1200 yards while catching passes from the likes of Kenny Pickett and Mason Rudolph?

The analytics actually show Lamb haveing an uper hand in several cateogries....Higher Y/RR (slightly), higher ADOT, etc. Pickens takes other categories like drop %, yac/catch, etc. Overall they were very similar value players in 2025, despite the difference in counting stats....which is kind of my point.
 
I'm honestly not trying to move the goal posts at all....I'm simply trying to figure out what your actual argument is since you cherry pick one piece of like 8 examples i've thrown out there over the last few posts. I've thrown out several examples of players like Garrett Wilson, Tee Higgins, Lamb, London, Metcalf, etc. hoping to get some sort of answer from you to advance the conversation.

Honestly I though the most recent season was an impotant factor in what your argument about the counting stats was, no? If not then why isnt Pickens in the top 10 conversation after his 2023 season racking up 1200 yards while catching passes from the likes of Kenny Pickett and Mason Rudolph?

The analytics actually show Lamb haveing an uper hand in several cateogries....Higher Y/RR (slightly), higher ADOT, etc. Pickens takes other categories like drop %, yac/catch, etc. Overall they were very similar value players in 2025, despite the difference in counting stats....which is kind of my point.
Bless your heart. Lol.
 
I'm honestly not trying to move the goal posts at all....I'm simply trying to figure out what your actual argument is since you cherry pick one piece of like 8 examples i've thrown out there over the last few posts. I've thrown out several examples of players like Garrett Wilson, Tee Higgins, Lamb, London, Metcalf, etc. hoping to get some sort of answer from you to advance the conversation.

Honestly I though the most recent season was an impotant factor in what your argument about the counting stats was, no? If not then why isnt Pickens in the top 10 conversation after his 2023 season racking up 1200 yards while catching passes from the likes of Kenny Pickett and Mason Rudolph?

The analytics actually show Lamb haveing an uper hand in several cateogries....Higher Y/RR (slightly), higher ADOT, etc. Pickens takes other categories like drop %, yac/catch, etc. Overall they were very similar value players in 2025, despite the difference in counting stats....which is kind of my point.
"If not then why isnt Pickens in the top 10 conversation after his 2023 season racking up 1200 yards while catching passes from the likes of Kenny Pickett and Mason Rudolph?"

Gee, I don't know!

Why is that????

Is it because "COUNTING STATS" is how they're generally ranked???

And they don't really handicap the numbers based on circumstances???

The only exceptions are guys who have already established themselves as ELITE based on "counting stats" in previous seasons, like Justin Jefferson or CeeDee Lamb.

You're trying SO hard and still coming up empty.

Why is there such a strong correlation between "counting stats" and where these guys are ranked????

Why aren't any of these top 10 WRs guys who have never cracked 1,000 yards???? Surely there are WRs out there who are very productive on a per-play or per-target basis who simply haven't ever had the # of opportunities to put up big "COUNTING STATS"! Why aren't any of them considered top 10?????
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
Why aren't any of these top 10 WRs guys who have never cracked 1,000 yards???? Surely there are WRs out there who are very productive on a per-play or per-target basis who simply haven't ever had the # of opportunities to put up big "COUNTING STATS"! Why aren't any of them considered top 10?????
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Why is a 1000 yard year now the benchmark? Wasn’t that the initial issue is you said Pickens was an afterthought in Pittsburgh because he only had 1 1,000 yard season?….kinda like drake London who made the top 10 list?

I remain confused why Pickens is an “afterthought” with 1 1,000 yard season in 3 years but London is a top 10 player with 1 1,000 yard season in 4 years?
 
Why is a 1000 yard year now the benchmark? Wasn’t that the initial issue is you said Pickens was an afterthought in Pittsburgh because he only had 1 1,000 yard season?….kinda like drake London who made the top 10 list?

I remain confused why Pickens is an “afterthought” with 1 1,000 yard season in 3 years but London is a top 10 player with 1 1,000 yard season in 4 years?

LOL, Drake London wasn't ranked top 10 by coaches, scouts and execs.

That's the point.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...p-10-wide-receivers-2026-execs-coaches-scouts

My first post said Pickens is UNIVERSALLY regarded as a top 10 WR. That isn't true of London.

His counting stats simply weren't impressive enough.

Weird how those who are paid to know this sport inside and out seem to think "counting stats" matter a hell of a lot more than you do.

Say, how come every single WR in that coach/scout/exex top 10 list has had monster "counting stats" seasons???? Where are the efficiency darlings who have never cracked 1,200 in their careers????
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
I've been watching and studying this sport for over 60 years. I forgot more than most of them will ever know.
You watch the TV broadcast like everyone else. You don't "study" anything.

You're a fan.

How many hours did you spend breaking down the all-22 tape of Cowboys games last year?
:laugh:
 
Pickens was an afterthought in Pittsburgh. One thousand yard season in his first 3 years.

And now after a year in Dallas, he's universally regarded as a top 10 WR in the league.

The Dak Effect.
GP does not have multiple children out of wedlock, been beaten unconscious on video, let dogs attack his neighbors, have sex in a club parking lot, nor has he been accused of rape. Sorry not seeing the Dak effect.
 
Pickens always had the talent- thats why when we traded for him everyone immediately was excited and all the Steeler fans were upset...they knew how good he was.

His diva antics are completely overblown and are probably amplified because Mike Tomlin coached football like it was 1995....same with all the boomers commenting on football stuff. Anytime a player wants the ball it's "he's toxic, a primadonna." It's a different world now
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,411
Messages
14,535,656
Members
24,211
Latest member
yurikodiaz21
Back
Top