JPM;1651031 said:I'm completely shocked the refs missed that.
StanleySpadowski;1651330 said:I'm confused as to why Chad Johnson didn't get an excessive celebration penalty on his first TD yesterday.
He'd promised that he was going to leap into Cleveland's "dawg pound". His first score was in the opposite endzone. He looked for the "dawg pound", saw it wasn't there then started for the other endzone with the ball. He stopped around the 20 or 30 then started back towards the endzone while another Bengal player was holding his jersey tail. All this commotion occurred on the field, not the sideline.
I agree that Owens broke the rule by using the ball as a prop but don't understand how Johnson's little deal wasn't a penalty.
WoodysGirl;1650976 said:Meanwhile, Patriots receiver Wes Welker spiked the ball after a catch against the Chargers last night, in plain view of at least one official, and there was no penalty. Aiello says, "it's a judgment call and the crew did not believe it was blatant enough to be penalized."
JPM;1651031 said:I'm completely shocked the refs missed that.
theogt;1650978 said:It's ridiculous and should be completely abolished.
Good point.Rack;1650992 said:
Unless it's completely BLATANT, it shouldn't be called. And if it's that blatant, it should be a taunting penalty, not "Delay of game".
It's a pathetic rule. Yet another aspect of the game for the refs to screw up.
Agreed. Once again it sounds like the NFL is afraid to play too hard with its favorite toy.WoodysGirl;1650976 said:Meanwhile, Patriots receiver Wes Welker spiked the ball after a catch against the Chargers last night, in plain view of at least one official, and there was no penalty. Aiello says, "it's a judgment call and the crew did not believe it was blatant enough to be penalized."
If the rule can't be enforced uniformly and in a way that everyone can understand, the league shouldn't have added it.