Would DeMarcus Lawrence skip the full season?
The Le'Veon Bell odyssey ultimately taught anyone paying attention one key lesson: That a player who is franchise tagged a second time can skip the full season and essentially avoid another f...
Read Full Story
I'm not certain that Florio is correct.
DLaw and Bell are different situations. DEs get bigger contracts than RBs. DLaw would get a contract that averages somewhere around 20M per. Khalil Mack averages 23.5M per. It would cost around 25M to franchise a player the 3rd time as of this year. The Cowboys would likely take DLaw at 3 years on the tag (17M, 20M,, ~25M) over giving him a long-term contract with big guaranteed money. The 3 years on the tag would average about 21M per with a huge risk reduction as compared to the long-term contract.
The biggest current RB contract averages 14.375M vs the 23.5M average for DE Khalil Mack.
The biggest question for Bell is whether he'll ever regain the 14.54M that he lost by not playing in 2018.
The value of players rarely goes up when they've been out of football for over a year.
The Steelers won't franchise him again, but if they did, Bell would be in a pickle. Would he hold out another year? At that point he would be 28 years old which is the age where the majority of RBs start to decline. Teams are well aware of the analytics regarding RBs beginning to decline at this age.
I think he would be forced to consider a reasonable contract offer from the Steelers if they did franchise him the 3rd time.