the problem with the last draft class isn't that so many are injured and some cut, etc. The problem was that we wasted a ton of picks and we knew it when we were doing it. Beuhler and Butler are turning out to be decent picks but the rest seem to be worthless. Two of our picks got cut. We went into the draft knowing that we wouldn't be able to keep the 12 or 13 players that we selected, not to mention UDFAs. So it would've been smarter to package some and trade up for better players or package some to trade for first day picks next year. By throwing in another draft pick or two, we easily could've moved up and gotten Unger if we really wanted him, or about anyone else...Maluga maybe...about anyone.
To me one of the biggest whiffs was that we passed on Sean Smith, who would've made the team and probably would've been contributing to what suddenly would've been a very deep and quality secondary and CB corps (not to mention Newman is getting older and to the end of his contract). We also missed, IMO, on WR Mike Wallace, someone who could upgrade our speed at WR and PR. We could've easily had both of those guys and still gotten Butler and Beuhler and still parlayed some other picks to higher rounds next year. I know hindsight is 20/20 and we still haven't seen how well some of these players will pan out but I think we could've gotten all of what I suggested accomplished. To me, this past draft, we used 12 or 13 picks to get 2-3 players and the front office seemed to know it when they were doing it. That just seems really wasteful. Next year's draft is really going to have some studs in the first 20 picks where we could get a future starting LT, a #1 WR, a true 3-4 NT, or etc, and it would've been nice to have a few extra picks and ammo to go get whomever we wanted or an extra player or two.
I guess I'm of the thought that draft fewer, higher quality players is better than a ton of mediocre and camp fodder type players.